mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] x86-64: Remove the PDA
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 12:05:39 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4973EE03.2060106@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <73c1f2160901181852q1c063011lf9d4588ce9a19dd1@mail.gmail.com>

Hello, Brian.

Brian Gerst wrote:
>> As discussed before, the above chunks do drop one #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
>> but it does add a obscure relocation and please note that it's
>> different from early_gdt_descr.  early_gdt_descr is needed to bring up
>> the cpu so there's no other way to do it but to relocate it in
>> assembly.  If you absolutely have to relocate irq_stack_ptr early,
>> please do it in C code in head64.c but then again irq_stack_ptr is not
>> even necessary till traps_init() which is way after per cpu area
>> setup.  So, the above two chunks are not necessary && even if they go
>> in, they don't have much to do with this patch.
> 
> I'll give you that this particular variable doesn't need early
> adjustment currently.  I'd prefer if you left the ifdef off the first
> hunk, though.  A comment will suffice to document that the initial
> value is going to be overwritten later on SMP.

Yeah, maybe.  I don't know.  If we ever get to a point where we can
fully initialize per cpu area for cpu0, things like this can probably
go away, but for now, I just thought it would be better to make it
clear that UP and SMP are taking different initialization paths &&
that was how the code looked like before this patch, so...  But no big
deal one way or another, right?

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

  reply	other threads:[~2009-01-19  3:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-01-18 16:39 [PATCHSET x86:core/percpu] percpu: move PDA fields to percpu Tejun Heo
2009-01-18 16:39 ` [PATCH 01/12] x86-64: Move irq stats from PDA to per-cpu and consolidate with 32-bit Tejun Heo
2009-01-18 16:39 ` [PATCH 02/12] x86-64: Move TLB state " Tejun Heo
2009-01-18 16:39 ` [PATCH 03/12] x86-64: Convert irqstacks to per-cpu Tejun Heo
2009-01-18 18:16   ` Brian Gerst
2009-01-18 23:38     ` Tejun Heo
2009-01-18 23:43       ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-19  0:52         ` Tejun Heo
2009-01-18 16:39 ` [PATCH 04/12] x86-64: Convert exception stacks " Tejun Heo
2009-01-18 16:39 ` [PATCH 05/12] x86-64: Move cpu number from PDA to per-cpu and consolidate with 32-bit Tejun Heo
2009-01-18 16:39 ` [PATCH 06/12] x86-64: Move current task " Tejun Heo
2009-01-18 16:39 ` [PATCH 07/12] x86-64: Move kernelstack from PDA to per-cpu Tejun Heo
2009-01-18 16:39 ` [PATCH 08/12] x86-64: Move oldrsp " Tejun Heo
2009-01-18 16:39 ` [PATCH 09/12] x86-64: Move irqcount " Tejun Heo
2009-01-18 16:39 ` [PATCH 10/12] x86-64: Move nodenumber " Tejun Heo
2009-01-18 16:39 ` [PATCH 11/12] x86-64: Move isidle " Tejun Heo
2009-01-18 16:39 ` [PATCH 12/12] x86-64: Use absolute displacements for per-cpu accesses Tejun Heo
2009-01-18 16:49 ` [PATCHSET x86:core/percpu] percpu: move PDA fields to percpu Ingo Molnar
2009-01-19  0:51 ` Brian Gerst
2009-01-19  0:52   ` [PATCH 1/5] x86-64: Remove pda_init() Brian Gerst
2009-01-19  0:52     ` [PATCH 2/5] percpu: Refactor percpu.h Brian Gerst
2009-01-19  0:52       ` [PATCH 3/5] x86-64: Rework __per_cpu_load adjustments Brian Gerst
2009-01-19  0:52         ` [PATCH 4/5] x86-64: Remove the PDA Brian Gerst
2009-01-19  0:52           ` [PATCH 5/5] x86-64: Remove pda.h Brian Gerst
2009-01-19  2:46             ` [PATCH 6/6] linker script: kill PERCPU_VADDR_PREALLOC() Tejun Heo
2009-01-19  2:18           ` [PATCH 4/5] x86-64: Remove the PDA Tejun Heo
2009-01-19  2:52             ` Brian Gerst
2009-01-19  3:05               ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2009-01-19  2:46           ` [PATCH UPDATED 4/5] x86-64: Move stack_canary into irq_stack Tejun Heo
2009-02-05 22:30       ` [PATCH 2/5] percpu: Refactor percpu.h Tony Luck
2009-02-06 11:11         ` Brian Gerst
2009-02-06 19:06           ` Luck, Tony
2009-01-19  9:53     ` [PATCH 1/5] x86-64: Remove pda_init() Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-19  2:45   ` [PATCHSET x86:core/percpu] percpu: move PDA fields to percpu Tejun Heo
2009-01-19 11:19     ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-19 11:35       ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-19 13:43         ` Tejun Heo
2009-01-20  3:34           ` Tejun Heo
2009-01-20  7:24             ` Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4973EE03.2060106@kernel.org \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=brgerst@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome