From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] x86-64: Remove the PDA
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 12:05:39 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4973EE03.2060106@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <73c1f2160901181852q1c063011lf9d4588ce9a19dd1@mail.gmail.com>
Hello, Brian.
Brian Gerst wrote:
>> As discussed before, the above chunks do drop one #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
>> but it does add a obscure relocation and please note that it's
>> different from early_gdt_descr. early_gdt_descr is needed to bring up
>> the cpu so there's no other way to do it but to relocate it in
>> assembly. If you absolutely have to relocate irq_stack_ptr early,
>> please do it in C code in head64.c but then again irq_stack_ptr is not
>> even necessary till traps_init() which is way after per cpu area
>> setup. So, the above two chunks are not necessary && even if they go
>> in, they don't have much to do with this patch.
>
> I'll give you that this particular variable doesn't need early
> adjustment currently. I'd prefer if you left the ifdef off the first
> hunk, though. A comment will suffice to document that the initial
> value is going to be overwritten later on SMP.
Yeah, maybe. I don't know. If we ever get to a point where we can
fully initialize per cpu area for cpu0, things like this can probably
go away, but for now, I just thought it would be better to make it
clear that UP and SMP are taking different initialization paths &&
that was how the code looked like before this patch, so... But no big
deal one way or another, right?
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-19 3:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-18 16:39 [PATCHSET x86:core/percpu] percpu: move PDA fields to percpu Tejun Heo
2009-01-18 16:39 ` [PATCH 01/12] x86-64: Move irq stats from PDA to per-cpu and consolidate with 32-bit Tejun Heo
2009-01-18 16:39 ` [PATCH 02/12] x86-64: Move TLB state " Tejun Heo
2009-01-18 16:39 ` [PATCH 03/12] x86-64: Convert irqstacks to per-cpu Tejun Heo
2009-01-18 18:16 ` Brian Gerst
2009-01-18 23:38 ` Tejun Heo
2009-01-18 23:43 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-19 0:52 ` Tejun Heo
2009-01-18 16:39 ` [PATCH 04/12] x86-64: Convert exception stacks " Tejun Heo
2009-01-18 16:39 ` [PATCH 05/12] x86-64: Move cpu number from PDA to per-cpu and consolidate with 32-bit Tejun Heo
2009-01-18 16:39 ` [PATCH 06/12] x86-64: Move current task " Tejun Heo
2009-01-18 16:39 ` [PATCH 07/12] x86-64: Move kernelstack from PDA to per-cpu Tejun Heo
2009-01-18 16:39 ` [PATCH 08/12] x86-64: Move oldrsp " Tejun Heo
2009-01-18 16:39 ` [PATCH 09/12] x86-64: Move irqcount " Tejun Heo
2009-01-18 16:39 ` [PATCH 10/12] x86-64: Move nodenumber " Tejun Heo
2009-01-18 16:39 ` [PATCH 11/12] x86-64: Move isidle " Tejun Heo
2009-01-18 16:39 ` [PATCH 12/12] x86-64: Use absolute displacements for per-cpu accesses Tejun Heo
2009-01-18 16:49 ` [PATCHSET x86:core/percpu] percpu: move PDA fields to percpu Ingo Molnar
2009-01-19 0:51 ` Brian Gerst
2009-01-19 0:52 ` [PATCH 1/5] x86-64: Remove pda_init() Brian Gerst
2009-01-19 0:52 ` [PATCH 2/5] percpu: Refactor percpu.h Brian Gerst
2009-01-19 0:52 ` [PATCH 3/5] x86-64: Rework __per_cpu_load adjustments Brian Gerst
2009-01-19 0:52 ` [PATCH 4/5] x86-64: Remove the PDA Brian Gerst
2009-01-19 0:52 ` [PATCH 5/5] x86-64: Remove pda.h Brian Gerst
2009-01-19 2:46 ` [PATCH 6/6] linker script: kill PERCPU_VADDR_PREALLOC() Tejun Heo
2009-01-19 2:18 ` [PATCH 4/5] x86-64: Remove the PDA Tejun Heo
2009-01-19 2:52 ` Brian Gerst
2009-01-19 3:05 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2009-01-19 2:46 ` [PATCH UPDATED 4/5] x86-64: Move stack_canary into irq_stack Tejun Heo
2009-02-05 22:30 ` [PATCH 2/5] percpu: Refactor percpu.h Tony Luck
2009-02-06 11:11 ` Brian Gerst
2009-02-06 19:06 ` Luck, Tony
2009-01-19 9:53 ` [PATCH 1/5] x86-64: Remove pda_init() Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-19 2:45 ` [PATCHSET x86:core/percpu] percpu: move PDA fields to percpu Tejun Heo
2009-01-19 11:19 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-19 11:35 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-19 13:43 ` Tejun Heo
2009-01-20 3:34 ` Tejun Heo
2009-01-20 7:24 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4973EE03.2060106@kernel.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=brgerst@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome