From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-wm1-f47.google.com (mail-wm1-f47.google.com [209.85.128.47]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5397A330D35 for ; Sat, 15 Aug 2026 11:39:51 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.128.47 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1786793992; cv=none; b=UW23HkwYrTLxXqKbxiEZWjuPEHoEb2FcSLZlNOJAgWndv3R20QnlSTm6STCnl9mVOCqpfseWa9UNXH4KOH7sZO7TTpDDAx3MagkWlySmJVBSBNTgXcgW9IZ+ZFGDA4EEKwLAivJPe25iAtZq0roLeY1oA+c58946JJq/yrRkiaY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1786793992; c=relaxed/simple; bh=IR0YYfxxWEISJzS6djOa3HjOjfoYQWVxSn+BVN0rc0c=; h=Message-ID:Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References: Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=VPeFnS5haQdm1Lp+qVFuFdD9b67amGx82SXnslDWTgPJaKB/Q0JFYqVDkmX0P6IJeTY2kCkVJG5ImFMIU5gII20iMPloJPupsTGKrCGEcWeogSnv+WUUwjdaRibR2mmwbQOqZnsZq0n7PIHH7jUnPqJtwFuQFu0vhAEuBbPmCD4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=KUKmJI3z; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.128.47 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="KUKmJI3z" Received: by mail-wm1-f47.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-4995b0343c1so18463815e9.3 for ; Sat, 15 Aug 2026 04:39:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20251104; t=1786793990; x=1787398790; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=mime-version:user-agent:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :references:in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject:message-id:from:to :cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to:content-type; bh=IR0YYfxxWEISJzS6djOa3HjOjfoYQWVxSn+BVN0rc0c=; b=KUKmJI3ztzq+BTqIB4p0UFxG3NDio4Lw8N4b4C1qyDqkLPT6VitoDwel2bK1G62Imw ttnDxEP52X15wmIKHiJLW06O9B6lgh/Cd3Q7kDhOWqlAe5AVmvnYHLZKnkxSix4WWR4t 1P/8fkq2F3qgNZHPFQ94JegCbxBMSDXysuH2CHAgrjx9cNx4rKwJs8M0/gv+JGMQ4Dmm cEfb3GczA1AWHW47QEDS8RwbeF2dJoP0cJ4uhSNN1SrVTnf5+MlVgejC3a8iW9LulgAI C969vpLwfPPNB1D0Q27EgcM68lbM9LpXgAseWqllcFCVB5FJQ1kCbw1JcSAfA1Z6E8kz UJzA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20251104; t=1786793990; x=1787398790; h=mime-version:user-agent:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :references:in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject:message-id:x-gm-gg :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to :content-type; bh=IR0YYfxxWEISJzS6djOa3HjOjfoYQWVxSn+BVN0rc0c=; b=HY1zkqESla9+9gpo34jJi0JymS1vcH3VF2zI93qxJ8CyYQp4Ab6AQYOfdCYtp83G1b cbDKuN+ZOnCbDuq+DqLHjTYjniMnHeDbWdCSzihKlIH4ZmEmWQ8svqfQRxHEIF6Ti6dw OuOcahJB8zsmCezj2pt7+0wdRAqUJOdCV0sdu8ORM4utPYWpf8FNyg3bEKEXSjNEQmpk qDW0tvY+seYagpBfqpzejZxw1uMbyvWCWRuvR3ajul8F9YaXoqV11kjy1x38d7eOAeah MGft2QZ3yrQT+H2f49RGSY5BBigkc62s/bvPPpMxZIp0LxNTTiKZJaAWL/eehlISmgqr fx6w== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AHgh+Ro/4HaceqQ5FpprZHxeTTFGejdCe3WPKga3m0qhfK8nyxM67CQAmfK7QG4kup6wloCpDt+rlsdRJBFNloA=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzzFdLdRH3HofLDGjqwLvs+vT5kzT+fUC4Pw+c5kHlOaupI9CZ2 DWPyZgdlypkK46X8wDnVqKJk6a2urMMCVyPfsxfPczMwe9Ged2gre91h+q4ILuYo X-Gm-Gg: AR+sD12IE9RUsfBPHtmSCH47FaE1UlGKLyCSAfYh82I8LBVqfGZ7CLbsYWQH8Xl98a3 qpq8ol/bWFK3UxeY7CTVPi0CNVAGqIweYzt6b3JujiJi0VdQuuWIupAAAof1X+mBho94aaSxchD psIZ2O7xjb5525pqNY+FtUYNGvbqsxulk7Guz5OpkzRHVAxgHggfQswAQ9y8MLBp/Rg4DeacSGo i7qnuUgQ+yctaPD2/EfEOatWi8lIweyiMfWRac5L8vdpJ3sz/LorFJ+ITrMWsXm16t6fP5fA+xC 7vNPAVGTAj+oJ1bR+wUc4zsD1L0hAx9pApxpjLItktY3HuNeL8gFO+xoaDjeJE9SPiLQPWGgQf1 i9JM4hGOr7V602N3265jXfTx3kvrvznZRqcuTi/yCEEw/TMZ1ky4A2jBzsloQ1LcQdUK86NRcIT wzzjhRS7YaUXUmEbpPw/vfsDQ0iyNic3AVEQSjpd3Ndfq0PYz2U4iUQVGxM8hr4Q7L06mEQzV+ X-Received: by 2002:a7b:c348:0:b0:499:795a:c60b with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-499879a3c5fmr131538805e9.19.1786793989489; Sat, 15 Aug 2026 04:39:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.245.245.10] ([134.191.227.46]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ffacd0b85a97d-4815f2cc81csm16430398f8f.34.2026.08.15.04.39.47 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 15 Aug 2026 04:39:48 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <498af8d6a5de3ee05e0216ea075c0eebf88c7072.camel@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] tdx-guest: Make Quote buffer size dynamic From: Artem Bityutskiy To: "Edgecombe, Rick P" , "seanjc@google.com" Cc: "tglx@kernel.org" , "mingo@redhat.com" , "x86@kernel.org" , "kas@kernel.org" , "binbin.wu@linux.intel.com" , "Li, Xiaoyao" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com" , "dave.hansen@linux.intel.com" , "kvm@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-coco@lists.linux.dev" , "hpa@zytor.com" , "bp@alien8.de" , "Fang, Peter" Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2026 14:39:46 +0300 In-Reply-To: <21ffbb7b80c0c654c23a97cda55f43c73e49ba25.camel@intel.com> References: <20260729122939.1340412-1-peter.fang@intel.com> <80b4ea89ebf17398c3bee21d157c7f97ea32aadf.camel@intel.com> <86d532f33816cd4fa3e29c40079a6003abf89324.camel@intel.com> <20260812223707.GD1013044@pedri> <6191a69559e58e04c8e3f1efa776e9639796af3d.camel@intel.com> <98dcc8a12f117745a1cb9981dc8f0f1548e9c96f.camel@gmail.com> <4ad451969522eecb445289ca74a88ee73d51336d.camel@intel.com> <8b432c8731167e97432b2e917d0b1c855fedf47c.camel@gmail.com> <21ffbb7b80c0c654c23a97cda55f43c73e49ba25.camel@intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.60.2 (3.60.2-1.fc44) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 On Fri, 2026-08-14 at 15:55 +0000, Edgecombe, Rick P wrote: > On Fri, 2026-08-14 at 08:45 +0300, Artem Bityutskiy wrote: > > But why DICE-based attestation uses 2-flow design? Could TD run a > > TDCALL[TDG.GET.QUOTE2] or something directly. No concept of TD report > > would be needed. That would be my current vision of "cleanest". >=20 > We discussed this approach internally and in PUCK. The problem is there i= s a > shared resource, and so something needs to handle locking and fairness be= tween > the guests. Going to the host keeps all the scheduling type stuff in that > domain. Good point. I did not think about this aspect. I am curious if today this is an attestation-only problem or a pattern. I mean this "many TDs compete for a shared TDX capability, VMM needs to be involved to handle fairness". Thanks, Artem.