From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757222AbZBSOA0 (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Feb 2009 09:00:26 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753141AbZBSOAK (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Feb 2009 09:00:10 -0500 Received: from mail122.emailantidote.com ([80.169.59.122]:51486 "EHLO SC-MTA-03.mxsweep.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751846AbZBSOAI (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Feb 2009 09:00:08 -0500 X-Greylist: delayed 573 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Thu, 19 Feb 2009 09:00:08 EST Message-ID: <499D639E.6090205@draigBrady.com> Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 13:50:22 +0000 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?P=E1draig_Brady?= User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20071008) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Justin Piszcz CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: General question (scheduler) with SSDs? References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 19 Feb 2009 13:50:26.0302 (UTC) FILETIME=[04AF51E0:01C99299] x-MXSweep-KeywordsCount: 0 x-MXSweep-MetaScanResult: Clean x-MXSweep-MetaScanThreat: x-MXSweep-VirusScanned: OK x-MXPurifier-SpamScore: 0 x-MXPurifier-VirusScore: 0 x-MXSweep-Threat: Clean X-MXUniqueID: fb03b1bb-b86c-4a87-be91-d1cc742ca87e Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Justin Piszcz wrote: > Hello, > > I was curious if anyone had done any benchmarks and/or has conclusive > information, what is the best Linux scheduler to use with SSDs? > > Noop? > CFQ? > AS? > Deadline? There was a thread started on that recently: http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/1/30/288