From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758631AbZBYBrI (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Feb 2009 20:47:08 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754732AbZBYBqz (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Feb 2009 20:46:55 -0500 Received: from hawking.rebel.net.au ([203.20.69.83]:39461 "EHLO hawking.rebel.net.au" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752098AbZBYBqz (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Feb 2009 20:46:55 -0500 X-Greylist: delayed 306 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 20:46:55 EST Message-ID: <49A4A1D3.8070402@davidnewall.com> Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 12:11:39 +1030 From: David Newall User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080227) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Joe Perches CC: LKML Subject: Re: List of 404 URLs in kernel .c and .h files References: <1235506239.2501.46.camel@localhost> In-Reply-To: <1235506239.2501.46.camel@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Joe Perches wrote: > Any suggestions on what if anything should be done > to the sources with these dead links? Unless you have a better reference, leave them. Even if they 404, they still provide a good starting point to search.