From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965307AbWI1K4N (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Sep 2006 06:56:13 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965308AbWI1K4N (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Sep 2006 06:56:13 -0400 Received: from mail-in-02.arcor-online.net ([151.189.21.42]:7569 "EHLO mail-in-01.arcor-online.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965307AbWI1K4M (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Sep 2006 06:56:12 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20060928102100.GA27424@uranus.ravnborg.org> References: <20060928060224.GA16290@aepfle.de> <20060928102100.GA27424@uranus.ravnborg.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <49C331A3-512C-4CFF-8226-A6540166815F@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Jan Engelhardt , Olaf Hering , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Segher Boessenkool Subject: Re: [PATCH] add XARGS to toplevel Makefile Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 12:55:00 +0200 To: Sam Ravnborg X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >>> run xargs with --no-run-if-empty to avoid random failures: >> >> How about the short option, -r? > Is it more portable - otherwise the more descriptive option is > preferred. Neither is portable, and -r tends to hide real bugs; please use something else instead, like making the relevant makefile targets non-fatal (lots of-em already are). Segher