From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au,
tglx@linutronix.de, jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/8] mm: allow preemption in apply_to_pte_range
Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2009 14:54:21 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49DBCB8D.7030509@goop.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090407143833.a6841a8b.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Andrew Morton wrote:
> So across the aptch series the aggregate change to mm/ is nil, and this
> is wholly an x86 patch series?
>
>
Functionally, yes. I also changed the name of the
arch_enter_lazy_cpu_mode() -> arch_start_context_switch() which affects
kernel/sched.c:context_switch(), but it is just a name update (which
also required an asm-frv update, which defines its own no-op version of
the macro rather than using the default no-op one, for some reason).
J
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-07 21:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-27 18:02 [PATCH] Allow preemption during lazy mmu updates Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-03-27 18:02 ` [PATCH 1/8] mm: disable preemption in apply_to_pte_range Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-03-27 18:02 ` [PATCH 2/8] x86/paravirt: remove lazy mode in interrupts Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-03-27 18:02 ` [PATCH 3/8] x86/pvops: replace arch_enter_lazy_cpu_mode with arch_start_context_switch Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-03-27 18:02 ` [PATCH 4/8] x86/paravirt: flush pending mmu updates on context switch Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-03-27 18:02 ` [PATCH 5/8] x86/paravirt: finish change from lazy cpu to context switch start/end Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-03-27 18:02 ` [PATCH 6/8] x86/paravirt: allow preemption with lazy mmu mode Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-03-27 18:02 ` [PATCH 7/8] mm: allow preemption in apply_to_pte_range Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-04-07 21:38 ` Andrew Morton
2009-04-07 21:54 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge [this message]
2009-03-27 18:02 ` [PATCH 8/8] x86/paravirt: use percpu_ rather than __get_cpu_var Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-03-27 23:48 ` [PATCH] Allow preemption during lazy mmu updates Peter Zijlstra
2009-04-08 14:54 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-08 15:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-04-19 10:15 ` Avi Kivity
2009-04-19 10:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-04-19 23:53 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-04-20 6:02 ` Avi Kivity
2009-04-08 17:32 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-04-08 18:10 ` David Howells
2009-04-08 18:30 ` [PATCH] FRV: Use <asm-generic/pgtable.h> in NOMMU mode David Howells
2009-04-08 18:35 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-04-08 18:44 ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-04-08 18:47 ` David Howells
2009-04-08 18:47 ` David Howells
2009-04-08 20:56 ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-04-08 21:25 ` David Howells
2009-04-08 21:40 ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-04-08 21:48 ` David Howells
2009-04-08 22:04 ` Sam Ravnborg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49DBCB8D.7030509@goop.org \
--to=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome