From: Sander Vanheule <sander@svanheule.net>
To: Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>,
Brendan Higgins <brendan.higgins@linux.dev>,
David Gow <davidgow@google.com>,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, kunit-dev@googlegroups.com
Cc: "Maíra Canal" <mairacanal@riseup.net>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Sander Vanheule" <sander@svanheule.net>
Subject: [PATCH v3 2/5] lib/test_cpumask: fix cpu_possible_mask last test
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2022 08:12:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49b026e3f062b9c8a1c58695c6607ae01ba88de5.1661234636.git.sander@svanheule.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1661234636.git.sander@svanheule.net>
Since cpumask_first() on the cpu_possible_mask must return at most
nr_cpu_ids - 1 for a valid result, cpumask_last() cannot return anything
larger than this value. As test_cpumask_weight() also verifies that the
total weight of cpu_possible_mask must equal nr_cpu_ids, the last bit
set in this mask must be at nr_cpu_ids - 1.
Fixes: c41e8866c28c ("lib/test: introduce cpumask KUnit test suite")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/346cb279-8e75-24b0-7d12-9803f2b41c73@riseup.net/
Reported-by: Maíra Canal <mairacanal@riseup.net>
Signed-off-by: Sander Vanheule <sander@svanheule.net>
Tested-by: Maíra Canal <mairacanal@riseup.net>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Acked-by: Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>
---
lib/test_cpumask.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/lib/test_cpumask.c b/lib/test_cpumask.c
index 4ebf9f5805f3..4d353614d853 100644
--- a/lib/test_cpumask.c
+++ b/lib/test_cpumask.c
@@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ static void test_cpumask_first(struct kunit *test)
static void test_cpumask_last(struct kunit *test)
{
KUNIT_EXPECT_LE(test, nr_cpumask_bits, cpumask_last(&mask_empty));
- KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, nr_cpumask_bits - 1, cpumask_last(cpu_possible_mask));
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, nr_cpu_ids - 1, cpumask_last(cpu_possible_mask));
}
static void test_cpumask_next(struct kunit *test)
--
2.37.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-23 6:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-23 6:12 [PATCH v3 0/5] cpumask: KUnit test suite fixes and improvements Sander Vanheule
2022-08-23 6:12 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] lib/test_cpumask: drop cpu_possible_mask full test Sander Vanheule
2022-08-23 6:12 ` Sander Vanheule [this message]
2022-08-23 6:12 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] lib/test_cpumask: follow KUnit style guidelines Sander Vanheule
2022-08-23 6:12 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] lib/cpumask_kunit: log mask contents Sander Vanheule
2022-08-23 6:12 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] lib/cpumask_kunit: add tests file to MAINTAINERS Sander Vanheule
2022-08-24 16:09 ` [PATCH v3 0/5] cpumask: KUnit test suite fixes and improvements Yury Norov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49b026e3f062b9c8a1c58695c6607ae01ba88de5.1661234636.git.sander@svanheule.net \
--to=sander@svanheule.net \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=brendan.higgins@linux.dev \
--cc=davidgow@google.com \
--cc=kunit-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
--cc=mairacanal@riseup.net \
--cc=yury.norov@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®