Re: Inquiry: Should we remove "isolcpus= kernel boot option? (may have realtime uses)

[GeunSik Lim <leemgs1@gmail.com>]

Dear Michael Trimarchi,

Recently, I read your paper about EDF implementation  in Linux  like belows.

http://feanor.sssup.it/~marko/SAC09.pdf
(An implementation of the earliest deadline first algorithm in Linux
Proceedings of the 2009 ACM symposium on Applied Computing. )

Can I get your 2.6.27 based EDF patch to  test your experiment result ?
Thanks reading.


Regards,
GeunSik, Lim


2008/6/5 Michael Trimarchi <trimarchimichael@yahoo.it>:
> [ sorry if this is going OT ]
>
> Hi,
>
>>
>> Furthermore, cpusets allow for isolated but load-balanced RT domains. We
>> now have a reasonably strong RT balancer, and I'm looking at implementing
>> a full partitioned EDF scheduler somewhere in the future.
>>
>
> I'm working on a partitioned EDF scheduler right now, and I have to
> face several issues, starting from the interface to use to expose the
> EDF scheduler to userspace, and the integration with the existing
> sched_rt policy.
>
> By now I'm experimenting with an additional sched_class that implements
> a SCHED_EDF policy, extending the POSIX struct sched_param with the
> EDF parameters of the task, do you see any better way to do that?
> Could that approach be reasonable?
>
> Michael
>
>
>      ___________________________________
> Scopri il Blog di Yahoo! Mail: trucchi, novità, consigli... e la tua opinione!
> http://www.ymailblogit.com/blog/
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>



-- 
Regards,
GeunSik Lim
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/