From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
To: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Question on lockdep and sysrq - d
Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 21:42:54 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A177ECE.7080508@candelatech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d82e647a0905221803w487fcdb3k2319bdaa7d9cc559@mail.gmail.com>
Ming Lei wrote:
> See http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124211522525625&w=2.
>
That is about some real bug in the official kernel. I am almost 100%
certain that my own code is at fault here.
I'm just trying to better understand the way lockdep prints out
all of the locks so I can easier debug my issue.
Thanks,
Ben
> thanks.
>
> 2009/5/23 Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>:
>
>> Hello!
>>
>> I'm trying to debug an apparent deadlock in some code I'm
>> writing.
>>
>> When I do a sysrq 'd', I get a nice dump of locks (I have lockdep enabled).
>>
>> However, the output appears to show multiple processes holding the
>> same locks (rtnl_mutex, for example):
>>
>> Showing all locks held in the system:
>> 3 locks held by events/11/63:
>> #0: (events){--..}, at: [<ffffffff8104f71e>] run_workqueue+0xb1/0x216
>> #1: ((linkwatch_work).work){--..}, at: [<ffffffff8104f71e>]
>> run_workqueue+0xb1/0x216
>> #2: (rtnl_mutex){--..}, at: [<ffffffff8125def1>] rtnl_lock+0x12/0x14
>> 1 lock held by irqbalance/3360:
>> #0: (rtnl_mutex){--..}, at: [<ffffffff8125def1>] rtnl_lock+0x12/0x14
>> 1 lock held by hald/3605:
>> #0: (rtnl_mutex){--..}, at: [<ffffffff8125def1>] rtnl_lock+0x12/0x14
>> ...
>>
>> Is this merely showing processes that are blocked on trying to acquire these
>> locks?
>>
>> If so, is there any way to tell which processes have fully acquired locks
>> v/s
>> just waiting to acquire them?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Ben
>>
--
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-23 4:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-23 0:31 Ben Greear
2009-05-23 1:03 ` Ming Lei
2009-05-23 4:42 ` Ben Greear [this message]
2009-05-23 12:33 ` Ming Lei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A177ECE.7080508@candelatech.com \
--to=greearb@candelatech.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tom.leiming@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®