mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@novell.com>
To: "Rusty Russell" <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Cc: <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	"Benjamin Herrenschmidt" <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	"Tim Abbott" <tabbott@mit.edu>, <sam@ravnborg.org>,
	"Paul Mackerras" <paulus@samba.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] also discard .*init sections after module initialization
Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2009 08:04:03 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A4B2683020000780000862F@vpn.id2.novell.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200907011452.26720.rusty@rustcorp.com.au>

>>> Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> 01.07.09 07:22 >>>
>On Tue, 30 Jun 2009 09:27:26 pm Jan Beulich wrote:
>> Just like .init, these sections are supposed to be unneeded after init,
>> and modpost warns about improper section references anyway.
>
>Tim Abbot had a section renaming patch, for -ffunction-sections.  Can we kill 
>two birds with one stone and have a unique string for init sections, and 
>another for exit sections?

Not sure, would need to see what that patch does first. And then, the patch
here doesn't do any renaming.

>> Likewise
>> for .*exit which, other than .exit, aren't needed for the module unload
>> path.
>
>Currently true, but I can't see that being true in general.

Why? .*exit sections deal with device/memory/CPU hot remove, which is
orthogonal to module unload.

Jan


  reply	other threads:[~2009-07-01  7:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-06-30 11:57 Jan Beulich
2009-07-01  5:22 ` Rusty Russell
2009-07-01  7:04   ` Jan Beulich [this message]
2009-07-06 15:55     ` Tim Abbott
2009-07-07  6:27       ` Jan Beulich
2009-07-01  7:28 ` Amerigo Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4A4B2683020000780000862F@vpn.id2.novell.com \
    --to=jbeulich@novell.com \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
    --cc=tabbott@mit.edu \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®