From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: lkml@morethan.org
Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Bug Fix]: Do 32-bit table calculations in pre-processor
Date: Fri, 03 Jul 2009 12:14:52 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A4E58AC.7010905@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200907031403.34566.lkml@morethan.org>
Michael S. Zick wrote:
>>
>> The PGTABLE reservation seems much too big. I think 1 page should be
>> sufficient for a system with large pages. Even if not, 0x6d000 is way
>> too large. And they symptoms of failing to reserve the initial
>> pagetable are pretty non-subtle.
>>
>
> Random system halts, deadlocks with interrupts disabled?
> Yup, that sounds familiar.
>
> If I ever get more than a stopped machine with a glowing power light;
> I will be certain to share.
>
Let's see... on a non-PSE system we may need one PDE and one PTE page
per 4 MB, up to 1 GB, for a total of 256 pages or 1 MB of memory, so in
that sense 0x6d000 (109 pages) doesn't sound at all unreasonable
(non-PSE system with 512 MB of RAM?)
However, we shouldn't have to do this kind of hacks with
MAPPING_BEYOND_END, and we *certainly* shouldn't do it by implicitly
hard-coding the value of PAGE_SHIFT.
-hpa
--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-03 19:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-03 18:14 Michael S. Zick
2009-07-03 18:27 ` Andi Kleen
2009-07-03 18:38 ` Michael S. Zick
2009-07-03 19:08 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-07-03 19:13 ` Michael S. Zick
2009-07-03 19:30 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-07-03 20:03 ` Michael S. Zick
2009-07-03 18:56 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-07-03 18:57 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-07-03 19:03 ` Michael S. Zick
2009-07-03 19:11 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-07-03 19:18 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-07-03 19:46 ` Michael S. Zick
2009-07-03 20:00 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-07-03 19:14 ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2009-07-03 19:41 ` Michael S. Zick
2009-07-03 19:48 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-07-03 20:38 ` Michael S. Zick
2009-07-03 20:40 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-07-03 21:02 ` Michael S. Zick
2009-07-03 22:33 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-07-04 0:05 ` Michael S. Zick
2009-07-04 0:11 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-07-03 22:01 ` Michael S. Zick
2009-07-04 13:23 ` Michael S. Zick
2009-07-03 19:33 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-07-03 20:07 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-07-03 20:08 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-07-03 20:48 ` Michael S. Zick
2009-07-03 20:45 ` Michael S. Zick
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A4E58AC.7010905@zytor.com \
--to=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkml@morethan.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®