mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthieu CASTET <matthieu.castet@parrot.com>
To: <pierre@ossman.eu>
Cc: <sdhci-devel@lists.ossman.eu>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: sdhci can turn off irq up to 200 ms
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 12:28:01 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A55C631.7030103@parrot.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A4B6184.7000903@parrot.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 733 bytes --]

Matthieu CASTET a écrit :
> Hi,
> 
> sdhci code got tasklets (sdhci_tasklet_card and sdhci_tasklet_finish),
> that does :
> {
> spin_lock_irqsave
> 
> if (cond) {
> sdhci_reset
> sdhci_reset
> }
> 
> spin_unlock_irqrestore
> }
> 
> The problem is that sdhci_reset [1] does busy pooling on a register up
> to a timeout of 100 ms.
> That's not low latency friendly.
> 
> On our system, we saw that sdhci_reset take 1 ms. That should be because
> we enter in mdelay, even if the hardware clears the bit faster.
> I wonder why there is an mdelay(1). Using cpu_relax and
> time_is_after_jiffies should make sdhci_reset faster.
> 
In case somebody cares, here a patch that reduce on our hardware
sdhci_reset from 1 ms to 30 us.


Matthieu

[-- Attachment #2: sdhci.diff --]
[-- Type: text/x-diff, Size: 763 bytes --]

diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
index 6779b4e..3e199b6 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
@@ -156,18 +156,17 @@ static void sdhci_reset(struct sdhci_host *host, u8 mask)
 		host->clock = 0;
 
 	/* Wait max 100 ms */
-	timeout = 100;
+	timeout = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(100);
 
 	/* hw clears the bit when it's done */
 	while (sdhci_readb(host, SDHCI_SOFTWARE_RESET) & mask) {
-		if (timeout == 0) {
+		if (time_is_before_jiffies(timeout)) {
 			printk(KERN_ERR "%s: Reset 0x%x never completed.\n",
 				mmc_hostname(host->mmc), (int)mask);
 			sdhci_dumpregs(host);
 			return;
 		}
-		timeout--;
-		mdelay(1);
+		cpu_relax();
 	}
 
 	if (host->quirks & SDHCI_QUIRK_RESTORE_IRQS_AFTER_RESET)

  reply	other threads:[~2009-07-09 10:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-07-01 13:15 Matthieu CASTET
2009-07-09 10:28 ` Matthieu CASTET [this message]
2009-09-06 13:25   ` Pierre Ossman
2009-09-07  9:56     ` Matthieu CASTET
2009-09-07 16:59       ` Pierre Ossman
2009-09-08  8:56         ` Matthieu CASTET
     [not found] <cT8cF-7kN-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found] ` <cVZ3a-71r-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
2009-09-07 19:47   ` Daniel J Blueman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4A55C631.7030103@parrot.com \
    --to=matthieu.castet@parrot.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pierre@ossman.eu \
    --cc=sdhci-devel@lists.ossman.eu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome