From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+w=401wt.eu-S1755962AbZHFOHS@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1755962AbZHFOHS (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Thu, 6 Aug 2009 10:07:18 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755537AbZHFOHR
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Thu, 6 Aug 2009 10:07:17 -0400
Received: from sinclair.provo.novell.com ([137.65.248.137]:26439 "EHLO
	sinclair.provo.novell.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1755458AbZHFOHQ convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT
	<rfc822;groupwise-ghaskins@novell.com;3:2>);
	Thu, 6 Aug 2009 10:07:16 -0400
Message-Id: <4A7AAB510200005A00051BF3@sinclair.provo.novell.com>
X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise Internet Agent 8.0.1 Beta 
Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2009 08:07:13 -0600
From: "Gregory Haskins" <ghaskins@novell.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: <alacrityvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>, "Avi Kivity" <avi@redhat.com>,
       <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
       <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] AlacrityVM guest drivers Reply-To:
References: <20090803171030.17268.26962.stgit@dev.haskins.net>
 <20090806081955.GA9752@redhat.com>
 <4A7A8F7B0200005A00051B84@sinclair.provo.novell.com>
 <4A7AD29E.50800@redhat.com>
 <4A7A9C6B0200005A00051BB9@sinclair.provo.novell.com>
 <4A7ADE23.5010208@redhat.com>
 <4A7AA63A0200005A00051BE2@sinclair.provo.novell.com>
 <20090806135903.GA11530@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <20090806135903.GA11530@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
Content-Disposition: inline
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

>>> On 8/6/2009 at  9:59 AM, in message <20090806135903.GA11530@redhat.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> wrote: 
> On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 07:45:30AM -0600, Gregory Haskins wrote:
>> > (though still rooting for virtio).
>> 
>> Heh...not to belabor the point to death, but virtio is orthogonal (you keep 
> forgetting that ;).
> 
> venet and virtio aren't orthogonal, are they?

See my last reply to Avi.

Regards,
-Greg