From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753353AbZHTDSk (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Aug 2009 23:18:40 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751848AbZHTDSk (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Aug 2009 23:18:40 -0400 Received: from cn.fujitsu.com ([222.73.24.84]:56329 "EHLO song.cn.fujitsu.com" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751484AbZHTDSj (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Aug 2009 23:18:39 -0400 Message-ID: <4A8CC03A.4010807@cn.fujitsu.com> Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 11:17:14 +0800 From: Li Zefan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1b3pre) Gecko/20090513 Fedora/3.0-2.3.beta2.fc11 Thunderbird/3.0b2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Paul Menage CC: akpm@linux-foundation.org, bblum@andrew.cmu.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, containers@lists.linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] Revert commit 8827c288feb7810185aa7c2e37537202fc709869 References: <20090818235059.22531.42618.stgit@menage.mtv.corp.google.com> <20090818235812.22531.76212.stgit@menage.mtv.corp.google.com> <4A8CB62F.8030504@cn.fujitsu.com> <6599ad830908191941x6ee47d58x295c29f80f8c624c@mail.gmail.com> <4A8CBEDC.6010709@cn.fujitsu.com> <6599ad830908192013p328a2256o8c807a160e25a9a3@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <6599ad830908192013p328a2256o8c807a160e25a9a3@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Paul Menage wrote: > On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 8:11 PM, Li Zefan wrote: >> As you said, the 2 patches differ just in using different var/func >> names, so rebasing shouldn't be hard but maybe a bit boring. >> > > Yes - it's a fair amount of work for no real gain. > Ok, I won't insist on how it should be done.