From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+w=401wt.eu-S1755468AbZHUP5F@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1755468AbZHUP5F (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Fri, 21 Aug 2009 11:57:05 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754651AbZHUP5F
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Fri, 21 Aug 2009 11:57:05 -0400
Received: from smtpauth.net4india.com ([202.71.129.41]:60719 "EHLO
	smtpauth.net4india.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1754612AbZHUP5E (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 21 Aug 2009 11:57:04 -0400
Message-ID: <4A8EC3BD.3000107@xenontk.org>
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 21:26:45 +0530
From: David John <davidjon@xenontk.org>
Reply-To: davidjon@xenontk.org
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; X; Linux x86_64; rv:1.9.1.1) Gecko/20090814 Thunderbird/3.0b3
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
CC: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>, Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
       erikm@nl.linux.org, vince@kyllikki.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
       linux-arm@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
       linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: Mailing lists have moved
References: <1250855566.3311.100.camel@macbook.infradead.org>	 <alpine.DEB.2.00.0908210925400.24646@utopia.booyaka.com> <1250868957.3311.110.camel@macbook.infradead.org>
In-Reply-To: <1250868957.3311.110.camel@macbook.infradead.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On 08/21/2009 09:05 PM, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-08-21 at 09:27 -0600, Paul Walmsley wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Russell no longer wants to maintain the mailing lists, so with his
>>> blessing I have set up replacements at lists.infradead.org.
>>
>> Can you help us understand why the existing linux-arm@vger.kernel.org
>> list is not used for this?
> 
> Russell didn't want to do that, so I offered an alternative solution
> preserving the three separate lists (l-a, l-a-kernel, l-a-toolchain).
> 

Would it be too much to ask that linux-arm@vger be used for ARM kernel
development, with the other two lists at infradead? Maintaining multiple
kernel development lists was one of the problems mentioned, with people
unsure as to which list to subscribe to and having to subscribe to both
lists in case mails were posted to the vger list.

Maintaining a _single_ kernel mailing list would be ideal.

Regards,
David.