mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>,
	Ravikiran G Thirumalai <kiran@scalex86.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, shai@scalex86.org,
	Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] x86: 2.6.31-rc7 crash due to buggy flat_phys_pkg_id
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 12:17:37 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A9438D1.4030608@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090825191231.GA22821@elte.hu>

Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> 
>> On Tue, 25 Aug 2009, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>>> initial apic id and apic id could be different.
>>>
>>> and we should use initial apic id to get correct phys pkg id in 
>>> case BIOS set crazy apic id.
>> Yinghai - I think you missed Cyrills' point.  Let me repeat it:
>>
>> 	"cpu_has_apic bit turned off"
>>
>> there's no apic. No "initial apic id". No "phys pkg id". No 
>> nothing.
>>
>> Discussions about "correct phys pkg id" are pointless.
> 
> that's not the case here though:
> 
> [    8.713916] Total of 32 processors activated (162314.96 BogoMIPS).
> 
> so APICs are active. The real difference is i think this aspect of 
> commit 2759c3287:
> 
>  static int flat_phys_pkg_id(int initial_apic_id, int index_msb)
>  {
> -       return hard_smp_processor_id() >> index_msb;
> +       return initial_apic_id >> index_msb;
>  }
> 
> We need to revert back to .30 behavior here. (In case of which 
> environment to trust we almost always trust whatever booted millions 
> of Linux boxes in the past already.)
> 
> Furthermore, commit 2759c3287 did not declare any side-effects and 
> clearly causes a side-effect on vSMP which apparently has an 
> overlapping set of initial APIC ids.
> 
> Ravikiran, your patch does not do a clear revert of this bit though. 
> If you do a plain revert of the line above alone, does that fix the 
> problem too?

how about patch phys_pkg_id for vsmp?

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/probe_64.c b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/probe_64.c
index f3b1037..65edc18 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/probe_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/probe_64.c
@@ -44,6 +44,11 @@ static struct apic *apic_probe[] __initdata = {
 	NULL,
 };
 
+static int apicid_phys_pkg_id(int initial_apic_id, int index_msb)
+{
+	return hard_smp_processor_id() >> index_msb;
+}
+
 /*
  * Check the APIC IDs in bios_cpu_apicid and choose the APIC mode.
  */
@@ -69,6 +74,11 @@ void __init default_setup_apic_routing(void)
 		printk(KERN_INFO "Setting APIC routing to %s\n", apic->name);
 	}
 
+	if (is_vsmp_box()) {
+		/* need to update phys_pkg_id */
+		apic->phys_pkg_id = apicid_phys_pkg_id;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * Now that apic routing model is selected, configure the
 	 * fault handling for intr remapping.

  reply	other threads:[~2009-08-25 19:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-08-24 18:26 Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2009-08-24 23:53 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-08-25  0:27   ` Yinghai Lu
2009-08-25  1:38     ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2009-08-25  5:03       ` Yinghai Lu
2009-08-25  1:26   ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2009-08-25  5:12     ` Yinghai Lu
2009-08-25 17:17       ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2009-08-25 18:15         ` Ingo Molnar
2009-08-25 18:31           ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2009-08-25 18:50             ` Yinghai Lu
2009-08-25 18:57               ` Linus Torvalds
2009-08-25 19:12                 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-08-25 19:17                   ` Yinghai Lu [this message]
2009-08-25 19:24                     ` Ingo Molnar
2009-08-25 20:36                       ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2009-08-25 20:44                         ` [PATCH] x86: fix vsmp booting with phys_pkg_id changing Yinghai Lu
2009-08-26  8:08                           ` Ingo Molnar
2009-08-26  8:15                           ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86: Fix vSMP boot crash tip-bot for Yinghai Lu
2009-08-25 19:53                   ` [patch] x86: 2.6.31-rc7 crash due to buggy flat_phys_pkg_id Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2009-08-25 18:59               ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2009-08-25 19:27               ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2009-08-25 19:33                 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-08-25 19:36                 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-08-25 19:20             ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2009-08-25 19:26               ` Ingo Molnar
2009-08-25 19:40               ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2009-08-25 18:35           ` Yinghai Lu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4A9438D1.4030608@kernel.org \
    --to=yinghai@kernel.org \
    --cc=gorcunov@gmail.com \
    --cc=kiran@scalex86.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=shai@scalex86.org \
    --cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome