From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com>,
Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@oracle.com>,
Xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
kurt.hackel@oracle.com, the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Glauber de Oliveira Costa <gcosta@redhat.com>,
Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com>,
Zach Brown <zach.brown@oracle.com>,
Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 3/5] x86/pvclock: add vsyscall implementation
Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2009 22:09:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4ACCF565.30804@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4ACCEC18.90401@goop.org>
On 10/07/2009 09:29 PM, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>
>> I'm a bit worried about the kernel playing with the hypervisor's
>> version field.
>>
> For Xen I explicitly made it not a problem by adding the notion of a
> secondary pvclock_vcpu_time_info structure which is updated by copying,
> aside from the version number which is updated as-is.
>
When do you copy?
I'd rather have a single copy for guest and host.
> As far as I can tell it isn't a problem for KVM either. The guest
> version number is atomic with respect to preemption by the hypervisor so
> there's no scope for racing. (The ABI already guarantees that the
> pvclock structures are never updated cross-cpu.)
>
> It ultimately doesn't matter what the version number is so long as it
> changes when the parameters are updated, and version numbers can't be
> reused within a window where things get confused.
>
If the hypervisor does a pvclock->version = somethingelse->version++
then the guest may get confused. But I understand you have a
guest-private ->version?
>> It's better to introduce yet a new version for the kernel, and check
>> both.
>>
> Two version numbers are awkward to read atomically at least on 32-bit.
> And I don't think its necessary.
>
No need to read them atomically.
cpu1 = vgetcpu()
hver1 = pvclock[cpu1].hver
kver1 = pvclock[cpu1].kver
tsc = rdtsc
/* multipication magic with pvclock[cpu1]*/
cpu2 = vgetcpu()
hver2 = pvclock[cpu2].hver
kver2 = pvclock[cpu2].kver
valid = cpu1 == cpu2 && hver1 == hver2 && kver1 == kver2
>> It's sufficient to increment a version counter on thread migration, no
>> need to do it on context switch.
>>
>>
> That's true; switch_out is a pessimistic approximation of that. But is
> there a convenient hook to test for migration?
>
I'd guess not but it's probably easy to add one in the migration thread.
--
Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for they are subtle and quick to panic.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-07 20:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-06 0:50 [PATCH RFC] Extending pvclock down to usermode for vsyscall Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-10-06 0:50 ` [PATCH 1/5] x86/pvclock: make sure rdtsc doesn't speculate out of region Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-10-06 0:50 ` [PATCH 2/5] x86/pvclock: no need to use strong read barriers in pvclock_get_time_values Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-10-06 0:50 ` [PATCH 3/5] x86/pvclock: add vsyscall implementation Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-10-06 9:04 ` Avi Kivity
2009-10-06 14:19 ` Dan Magenheimer
2009-10-06 15:11 ` Avi Kivity
2009-10-06 18:46 ` [Xen-devel] " Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-10-07 10:25 ` Avi Kivity
2009-10-07 19:29 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-10-07 20:09 ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2009-10-07 21:19 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-10-07 21:37 ` Avi Kivity
2009-10-07 21:51 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-10-07 21:53 ` Avi Kivity
2009-10-07 20:48 ` Dan Magenheimer
2009-10-07 21:08 ` Avi Kivity
2009-10-07 22:36 ` Dan Magenheimer
2009-10-10 0:24 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-10-10 18:10 ` Avi Kivity
2009-10-12 18:20 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-10-12 18:29 ` Avi Kivity
2009-10-12 19:13 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-10-13 6:39 ` Avi Kivity
2009-10-13 20:00 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-10-14 12:32 ` Avi Kivity
2009-10-15 19:17 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-10-27 17:29 ` Dan Magenheimer
2009-10-27 18:20 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-10-28 5:52 ` Avi Kivity
2009-10-28 9:29 ` Glauber Costa
2009-10-28 9:34 ` Avi Kivity
2009-10-28 17:47 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-10-29 12:13 ` Avi Kivity
2009-10-29 13:03 ` Chris Mason
2009-10-29 14:46 ` Dan Magenheimer
2009-10-29 15:07 ` Avi Kivity
2009-10-29 15:55 ` Dan Magenheimer
2009-10-29 16:15 ` Dan Magenheimer
2009-11-01 9:28 ` Avi Kivity
2009-11-02 15:28 ` Dan Magenheimer
2009-11-02 15:41 ` Avi Kivity
2009-11-01 9:32 ` Avi Kivity
2009-11-02 15:46 ` Dan Magenheimer
2009-11-03 5:12 ` Avi Kivity
2009-11-04 20:30 ` Dan Magenheimer
2009-11-05 6:47 ` Avi Kivity
2009-11-05 14:52 ` Dan Magenheimer
2009-11-05 15:07 ` Keir Fraser
2009-11-04 21:19 ` john stultz
2009-11-04 21:28 ` Dan Magenheimer
2009-11-05 0:02 ` john stultz
2009-11-05 0:45 ` Dan Magenheimer
2009-10-06 0:50 ` [PATCH 4/5] x86/fixmap: add a predicate for usermode fixmaps Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-10-06 10:23 ` [Xen-devel] " Jan Beulich
2009-10-06 18:47 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-10-06 0:50 ` [PATCH 5/5] xen/time: add pvclock_clocksource_vread support Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-10-06 10:28 ` [Xen-devel] " Jan Beulich
2009-10-06 18:48 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4ACCF565.30804@redhat.com \
--to=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=chris.mason@oracle.com \
--cc=dan.magenheimer@oracle.com \
--cc=gcosta@redhat.com \
--cc=jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com \
--cc=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=kurt.hackel@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
--cc=zach.brown@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome