mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: "Cihula, Joseph" <joseph.cihula@intel.com>,
	Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>, "Wang, Shane" <shane.wang@intel.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	"arjan@linux.intel.com" <arjan@linux.intel.com>,
	"chrisw@sous-sol.org" <chrisw@sous-sol.org>,
	"jmorris@namei.org" <jmorris@namei.org>,
	"jbeulich@novell.com" <jbeulich@novell.com>,
	"peterm@redhat.com" <peterm@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] intel_txt: add s3 userspace memory integrity verification
Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2009 09:53:37 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B194CA1.3070106@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091204171333.GS18989@one.firstfloor.org>

On 12/04/2009 09:13 AM, Andi Kleen wrote:
>>>
>>> So no, you did not audit do_suspend_lowlevel to make sure it does not
>>> follow function pointers. Bad.
>>
>> We aren't aware of any code or data used by the resume path that is outside of the tboot-MAC'ed regions above--if you can point out any then we will gladly address them.
> 
> Code coverage is not enough, you need data coverage too.  If someone 
> modifies kernel data it's typically easy to subvert code as a next step.
> 

The only function pointers that are invoked on the do_suspend_lowlevel
path are some paravirt_crap pointers, but those are located inside
kernel static data.

This is not to say that this isn't a new constraint, and should be
documented, and checked ahead of time...

	-hpa

-- 
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel.  I don't speak on their behalf.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-12-04 17:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-09-01  8:52 [PATCH] intel_txt: fix the build errors of intel_txt patch on non-X86 platforms (resend) Shane Wang
2009-09-27  9:07 ` [PATCH] intel_txt: add s3 userspace memory integrity verification Shane Wang
2009-09-29  2:27   ` [PATCH] intel_txt: fix the buggy timeout warning logic in tboot Shane Wang
2009-10-04 18:58   ` [PATCH] intel_txt: add s3 userspace memory integrity verification Pavel Machek
2009-10-04 23:26     ` Andi Kleen
2009-10-15  7:57     ` Wang, Shane
2009-12-04  9:07     ` Wang, Shane
2009-12-04  8:19       ` Pavel Machek
2009-12-04 16:46         ` Cihula, Joseph
2009-12-04 17:13           ` Andi Kleen
2009-12-04 17:41             ` Cihula, Joseph
2009-12-04 20:09               ` Andi Kleen
2009-12-04 20:17                 ` Cihula, Joseph
2009-12-04 20:31                   ` Andi Kleen
2009-12-04 21:27                   ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-12-04 17:53             ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2009-12-04 20:10               ` Andi Kleen
2009-12-04 22:25               ` Pavel Machek
2009-12-04 22:15           ` Pavel Machek
2009-12-04 22:24             ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-12-04 22:39               ` Pavel Machek
2009-12-04 22:46                 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-03-09  8:52     ` [PATCH v2] intel_txt: add support for S3 memory integrity protection within Intel(R) TXT launched kernel Wang, Shane
2010-03-09  9:06       ` Pavel Machek
2010-03-10  6:36       ` [PATCH v3] " Shane Wang
2010-03-10 20:31         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-03-19 21:18         ` [tip:x86/txt] x86, tboot: Add support for S3 memory integrity protection tip-bot for Shane Wang
2009-12-04  9:12 [PATCH] intel_txt: add s3 userspace memory integrity verification Shane Wang
2009-12-04  8:29 ` Pavel Machek
2009-12-04 16:52   ` Cihula, Joseph
2009-12-04 22:20     ` Pavel Machek
2009-12-04 11:05 ` Andi Kleen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4B194CA1.3070106@zytor.com \
    --to=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=chrisw@sous-sol.org \
    --cc=jbeulich@novell.com \
    --cc=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=joseph.cihula@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
    --cc=peterm@redhat.com \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=shane.wang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome