From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753699Ab0AHPrk (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Jan 2010 10:47:40 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753301Ab0AHPrj (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Jan 2010 10:47:39 -0500 Received: from hp3.statik.tu-cottbus.de ([141.43.120.68]:53048 "EHLO hp3.statik.tu-cottbus.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752985Ab0AHPrj (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Jan 2010 10:47:39 -0500 Message-ID: <4B475340.7040300@s5r6.in-berlin.de> Date: Fri, 08 Jan 2010 16:46:08 +0100 From: Stefan Richter User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.8.1.23) Gecko/20090825 SeaMonkey/1.1.18 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Robert P. J. Day" CC: Greg KH , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt to be updated soon? References: <20100103212913.GB3220@kroah.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Robert P. J. Day wrote: > either people should take it moderately seriously, or it should be > deleted as a waste of time. Whose time is it wasting? Arguably nobody's. If any of the features which are on the removal schedule affect you (you need them to go away, or you need them to stay), then talk to the concerned developers/ maintainers and, if necessary, send updates feature-removal-schedule.txt (push back dates, remove entries or whatever). -- Stefan Richter -=====-==-=- ---= -=--- http://arcgraph.de/sr/