From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933600Ab0BEHY7 (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Feb 2010 02:24:59 -0500 Received: from hera.kernel.org ([140.211.167.34]:35707 "EHLO hera.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933310Ab0BEHY5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Feb 2010 02:24:57 -0500 Message-ID: <4B6BC948.5030401@kernel.org> Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2010 16:31:20 +0900 From: Tejun Heo User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091130 SUSE/3.0.0-1.1.1 Thunderbird/3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ingo Molnar CC: Stephen Rothwell , Linus , Andrew Morton , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML , Rusty Russell , Christoph Lameter , "H. Peter Anvin" , Fr??d??ric Weisbecker Subject: Re: upcoming percpu changes References: <20100205161648.086375b9.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <4B6BB13C.2090108@kernel.org> <20100205070903.GA9320@elte.hu> In-Reply-To: <20100205070903.GA9320@elte.hu> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.3 (hera.kernel.org [127.0.0.1]); Fri, 05 Feb 2010 07:24:36 +0000 (UTC) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello, Ingo. On 02/05/2010 04:09 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote: > Has the review feedback from Frederic and hpa been addressed? (and have they > acked the solution?) That was the only controversial bit i remember. Al Viro said that, until sparse is improved, the only solution would be to work around in the rather ugly way as posted in the original patches. As Frederic and hpa preferred not having the workaround and there were only three instances in the kernel tree, I just left them alone so sparse warning will trigger spuriously on those three locations. Thanks. -- tejun