From: Mark Lord <kernel@teksavvy.com>
To: Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com>
Cc: jeff@garzik.org.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/4] libata: cache device select
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 00:13:34 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B7CCC7E.3060108@teksavvy.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100217130847.16338.55586.stgit@localhost.localdomain>
On 02/17/10 08:10, Alan Cox wrote:
> Avoid the device select overhead on every qc_issue (> 10uS) by caching the
> currently selected device. This shows up on profiles under load. Best case
> this costs us 10uS for the delay, worst case with a dumb interface it's
> costing us about *1mS* a command.
>
> I believe the logic here is sufficient, but would welcome some second reviews
> as its not something you want to get wrong !
>
> Signed-off-by: Alan Cox<alan@linux.intel.com>
..
I totally agree with this patch, but question the timings used to justify it.
Surely the overhead is only 1-2usec for the case where the device
is the one that was already selected (on a "smart" interface) ?
And for the case where the currently selected device is different
than the desired device (the 1msec case), this patch makes little/no difference?
Cheers
> ---
>
> drivers/ata/libata-sff.c | 8 ++++++--
> include/linux/libata.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
>
> diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-sff.c b/drivers/ata/libata-sff.c
> index 63d9c6a..cf0332a 100644
> --- a/drivers/ata/libata-sff.c
> +++ b/drivers/ata/libata-sff.c
> @@ -469,6 +469,7 @@ void ata_sff_dev_select(struct ata_port *ap, unsigned int device)
>
> iowrite8(tmp, ap->ioaddr.device_addr);
> ata_sff_pause(ap); /* needed; also flushes, for mmio */
> + ap->sff_selected = device;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ata_sff_dev_select);
>
> @@ -1538,7 +1539,8 @@ unsigned int ata_sff_qc_issue(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc)
> }
>
> /* select the device */
> - ata_dev_select(ap, qc->dev->devno, 1, 0);
> + if (qc->dev->devno != ap->sff_selected)
> + ata_dev_select(ap, qc->dev->devno, 1, 0);
>
> /* start the command */
> switch (qc->tf.protocol) {
> @@ -1925,6 +1927,8 @@ int ata_sff_prereset(struct ata_link *link, unsigned long deadline)
> struct ata_eh_context *ehc =&link->eh_context;
> int rc;
>
> + link->ap->sff_selected = -1; /* Unknown */
> +
> rc = ata_std_prereset(link, deadline);
> if (rc)
> return rc;
> @@ -2687,7 +2691,7 @@ void ata_bus_reset(struct ata_port *ap)
> iowrite8(ap->ctl, ioaddr->ctl_addr);
> ap->last_ctl = ap->ctl;
> }
> -
> + ap->sff_selected = -1;
> DPRINTK("EXIT\n");
> return;
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/libata.h b/include/linux/libata.h
> index 5fb8884..a85adc2 100644
> --- a/include/linux/libata.h
> +++ b/include/linux/libata.h
> @@ -725,6 +725,7 @@ struct ata_port {
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_ATA_SFF
> struct ata_ioports ioaddr; /* ATA cmd/ctl/dma register blocks */
> + int sff_selected; /* Cache of selected device */
> #endif /* CONFIG_ATA_SFF */
>
> u8 ctl; /* cache of ATA control register */
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-02-18 5:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-02-17 13:10 Alan Cox
2010-02-17 13:11 ` [RFC 2/4] libata: Remove excess delay in the tf_load path Alan Cox
2010-02-17 13:13 ` [RFC 3/4] libata: Remove excess command issue delays Alan Cox
2010-02-17 14:10 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2010-02-17 15:34 ` Alan Cox
2010-02-17 13:15 ` [RFC 4/4] libata: Make sil680 do its own exec_command posting Alan Cox
2010-02-18 5:13 ` Mark Lord [this message]
2010-02-18 10:16 ` [RFC 1/4] libata: cache device select Alan Cox
2010-03-01 20:15 ` Jeff Garzik
2010-03-02 17:28 ` Alan Cox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B7CCC7E.3060108@teksavvy.com \
--to=kernel@teksavvy.com \
--cc=alan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jeff@garzik.org.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome