From: Hitoshi Mitake <mitake@dcl.info.waseda.ac.jp>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@infradead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Floating point exception by perf record
Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2010 17:32:24 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BBC4318.1070702@dcl.info.waseda.ac.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100405183127.GA3677@ghostprotocols.net>
On 04/06/10 03:31, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Sun, Apr 04, 2010 at 05:10:57PM +0900, Hitoshi Mitake escreveu:
>> I suffered a mysterious floating point exception when executing perf
>> on current tip/master.
>>
>> For example,
>>
>> % sudo ./perf lock record ./perf bench sched messaging
>> # Running sched/messaging benchmark...
>> # 20 sender and receiver processes per group
>> # 10 groups == 400 processes run
>>
>> Total time: 1.375 [sec]
>> [ perf record: Woken up 0 times to write data ]
>> [ perf record: Captured and wrote 160.002 MB perf.data (~6990599
samples) ]
>> [1] 26348 floating point exception sudo ./perf lock record ./perf
>> bench sched messaging
>>
>> dmesg says that
>>
>> [10212.752490] perf[26348] trap divide error ip:7fade8564310
>> sp:7fff46d926e8 error:0 in libnewt.so.0.52.2[7fade8556000+15000]
>>
>> Example is of perf lock, but this is not a special phenomenon of
perf lock,
>> other users of perf record, like perf sched, caused the same problem.
>>
>> I found that this might be caused by the line 283 of perf.c
>>
>> if (fclose(stdout)) #<- closing stdout!
>> die("close failed on standard output: %s", strerror(errno));
>>
>> I don't know well about libnewt, do you know something like cause?
>>
>> The version of libnewt I'm using is 0.52.2 (default of Debian lenny)
>
> I just built a kernel where 'perf lock' can work, but I'm seeing a
> different problem:
>
> [root@doppio ~]# perf lock trace | head -3
> Warning: Error: expected 'data' but read 'overwrite'
> swapper-0 [000] 619.086424: lock_acquire:
0xffff8800029d4b28&q->lock
> swapper-0 [000] 619.086429: lock_acquire:
0xffff8800029d08f8&ctx->lock
> swapper-0 [000] 619.086439: lock_acquire:
0xffffffff81a38e58 clockevents_lock
> [root@doppio ~]# perf lock report | head -3
> Warning: Error: expected 'data' but read 'overwrite'
> ID Name acquired contended total
wait (ns) max wait (ns) min wait (ns)
>
> 0xffff8800029d4b28&q->lock 0 0 0
0 0
> [root@doppio ~]#
>
> My system details:
>
> [root@doppio ~]# uname -a
> Linux doppio.ghostprotocols.net 2.6.34-rc3-tip+ #1 SMP Mon Apr 5
13:49:42 BRT 2010 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
> [root@doppio ~]# rpm -q newt
> newt-0.52.10-4.fc11.x86_64
> [root@doppio ~]#
>
> No segfaults here :-\
>
> - Arnaldo
>
I tested perf lock trace and got a similar error (but different).
% sudo ./perf lock trace
Fatal: reading input file (size expected=3 received=0)
It seems that perf.data is broken :( I'll search the cause.
Hitoshi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-07 8:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-04-04 8:10 Hitoshi Mitake
2010-04-05 18:31 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2010-04-07 8:32 ` Hitoshi Mitake [this message]
2010-04-07 10:38 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2010-04-08 6:46 ` Hitoshi Mitake
2010-04-08 7:29 ` Hitoshi Mitake
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4BBC4318.1070702@dcl.info.waseda.ac.jp \
--to=mitake@dcl.info.waseda.ac.jp \
--cc=acme@infradead.org \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®