From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@redhat.com>
To: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>, Mark Wielaard <mjw@redhat.com>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Jim Keniston <jkenisto@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
"Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@redhat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 10/10] perf: perf interface for uprobes.
Date: Fri, 07 May 2010 13:53:37 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BE453A1.1060003@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100507022403.GH7426@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
>>
>> Could you also rebase your patch on the latest tip tree? :)
>> (and remove die() too)
>
> I was aware that I have to rebase the patch to the latest tip.
> However I wanted to get a working set out.
> Please expect the rebased version in the next version of the posting.
>
>>
>>> Here is a terminal snapshot of placing, using and removing a probe on a
>>> process with pid 3329 (corresponding to zsh)
>>>
>>> [ Probing a function in the executable using function name ]
>>> -------------------------------------------------------------
>>> [root@ABCD]# perf probe -p 3329 zfree@zsh
>>
>> Hmm, I'm not sure why we have to specify both of PID and exec name.
>> Is that possible to give a symbol as below? (omit exec name)
>>
>> # perf probe -p 3329 zfree
>
> Yes, If the symbol name belongs to th execfile then we can omit the
> execfile part. However for symbols outside the execname, the
> execfile(library file) is a must(atleast for now).
Good!:)
>>> Added new event:
>>> probe:p_3329_zfree (on 0x446420)
>>
>> Hmm, the event name should be simpler, as like as zfree_3329.
>> or, we might better make a new event group for each process, as like as
>> 'probe_3329:zfree'
>>
>
> Either zfree_3329 or having a new event group for each process is
> possible.
I think adding new groups make controlling those event easier.
(e.g. deleting all probes on exited process)
>> Hmm, if user gave --list with -p, what happened?
>> We need to check a bad combination and warn it.
>>
>
> Currently it would ignore -p option. i.e --list overrides.
> We could either warn, or error out. What do you suggest?
>
>>>
>>> + if (session.pid)
>>> + goto end_dwarf;
>>> +
>>
>> Again, it must be checked that the combination of -p option and dwarf requirement.
>> The latest code has perf_probe_event_need_dwarf(), so you can check it easier.
>>
>
> Okay,
>
>> [...]
>>> + else
>>> + free(pp->function);
>>> + pp->function = zalloc(sizeof(char *) * 20);
>>> + if (!pp->function)
>>> + die("Failed to allocate memory by zalloc.");
>>> + e_snprintf(pp->function, 20, "0x%llx", vaddr);
>>> +}
>>
>> Well, after rebasing, you'll need to remove die()s from here and
>> make it returns errors.
>>
>
> Okay.
>
>
>> [...]
>>> @@ -383,7 +450,11 @@ int synthesize_trace_kprobe_event(struct probe_point *pp)
>>> pp->probes[0] = buf = zalloc(MAX_CMDLEN);
>>> if (!buf)
>>> die("Failed to allocate memory by zalloc.");
>>> - ret = e_snprintf(buf, MAX_CMDLEN, "%s+%d", pp->function, pp->offset);
>>> + if (pp->offset)
>>> + ret = e_snprintf(buf, MAX_CMDLEN, "%s+%d", pp->function,
>>> + pp->offset);
>>> + else
>>> + ret = e_snprintf(buf, MAX_CMDLEN, "%s", pp->function);
>>> if (ret <= 0)
>>> goto error;
>>> len = ret;
>>
>> Isn't it a cleanup ?
>
> Can you please elaborate?
symbol+offset is always allowed even if offset == 0,
so I think this change isn't needed. I guessed it is just for cleanup.
>>> +void add_trace_uprobe_events(struct probe_point *probes, int nr_probes,
>>> + bool force_add, pid_t pid)
>>> +{
>>> + int fd = open_uprobe_events(O_RDWR, O_APPEND);
>>> + add_trace_probe_events(fd, probes, nr_probes, force_add, pid);
>>> +}
>>
>> Please close fd in the function which opened it.
>>
>
> Okay.
>
>>
>>> memset(&sym, 0, sizeof(sym));
>>> - if (!self->kernel) {
>>> + if (self->kernel || symbol_conf.sort_by_name)
>>> + self->adjust_symbols = 0;
>>> + else {
>>> self->adjust_symbols = (ehdr.e_type == ET_EXEC ||
>>> elf_section_by_name(elf, &ehdr, &shdr,
>>> ".gnu.prelink_undo",
>>> NULL) != NULL);
>>> - } else self->adjust_symbols = 0;
>>> + }
>>>
>>> elf_symtab__for_each_symbol(syms, nr_syms, idx, sym) {
>>> struct symbol *f;
>>
>> This one changes the symbol.c, so I think you'd better make a
>> separate patch for this change.
>
> Okay, I will separate it in the next version.
> Thanks Masami for the review.
Thank you!
--
Masami Hiramatsu
e-mail: mhiramat@redhat.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-07 17:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-06 18:01 [PATCH v3 0/10] Uprobes v3 Srikar Dronamraju
2010-05-06 18:01 ` [PATCH v3 1/10] X86 instruction analysis: Move Macro W to insn.h Srikar Dronamraju
2010-05-06 18:02 ` [PATCH v3 2/10] User Space Breakpoint Assistance Layer Srikar Dronamraju
2010-05-06 18:02 ` [PATCH v3 3/10] x86 support for User space breakpoint assistance Srikar Dronamraju
2010-05-06 18:02 ` [PATCH v3 4/10] Slot allocation for execution out of line (XOL) Srikar Dronamraju
2010-05-06 18:02 ` [PATCH v3 5/10] Uprobes Implementation Srikar Dronamraju
2010-05-06 18:02 ` [PATCH v3 6/10] x86 support for Uprobes Srikar Dronamraju
2010-05-06 18:03 ` [PATCH v3 7/10] samples: Uprobes samples Srikar Dronamraju
2010-05-06 18:03 ` [PATCH v3 8/10] Uprobes documentation Srikar Dronamraju
2010-05-06 18:03 ` [PATCH v3 9/10] trace: uprobes trace_event interface Srikar Dronamraju
2010-05-06 18:03 ` [PATCH v3 10/10] perf: perf interface for uprobes Srikar Dronamraju
2010-05-06 23:13 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2010-05-07 2:24 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2010-05-07 17:53 ` Masami Hiramatsu [this message]
2010-05-09 11:18 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2010-05-11 20:59 ` [PATCH v3 0/10] Uprobes v3 Peter Zijlstra
2010-05-12 10:25 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2010-05-12 12:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-05-12 13:27 ` Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
2010-05-12 13:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-05-12 14:04 ` Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
2010-05-12 14:46 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2010-05-12 16:55 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-05-12 17:59 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2010-05-13 12:07 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2010-05-12 10:38 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-05-12 13:39 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2010-05-12 14:53 ` Frederic Weisbecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4BE453A1.1060003@redhat.com \
--to=mhiramat@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ananth@in.ibm.com \
--cc=fche@redhat.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jkenisto@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=mjw@redhat.com \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rdunlap@xenotime.net \
--cc=roland@redhat.com \
--cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome