From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: mingo@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
suresh.b.siddha@intel.com, tglx@linutronix.de, avi@redhat.com,
linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tip:x86/fpu] x86: Add new static_cpu_has() function using alternatives
Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 13:58:42 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BF2FF82.7090005@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1274213443.2485.3.camel@edumazet-laptop>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1377 bytes --]
On 05/18/2010 01:10 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>
> Might be time to change Documentation/Changes about gcc requirements ...
>
> # make
> CHK include/linux/version.h
> CHK include/generated/utsrelease.h
> CALL scripts/checksyscalls.sh
> CHK include/generated/compile.h
> CC arch/x86/kernel/process_32.o
> /usr/src/linux-2.6/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h: In function
> `prepare_to_copy':
> /usr/src/linux-2.6/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h:315: warning: asm
> operand 1 probably doesn't match constraints
> /usr/src/linux-2.6/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h:315: error:
> impossible constraint in `asm'
> /usr/src/linux-2.6/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h:313: warning:
> 'flag' might be used uninitialized in this function
> make[2]: *** [arch/x86/kernel/process_32.o] Error 1
> make[1]: *** [arch/x86/kernel] Error 2
> make: *** [arch/x86] Error 2
> # gcc -v
> Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc/i386-redhat-linux/3.4.6/specs
> Configured with: ../configure --prefix=/usr --mandir=/usr/share/man
> --infodir=/usr/share/info --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix
> --disable-checking --with-system-zlib --enable-__cxa_atexit
> --disable-libunwind-exceptions --enable-java-awt=gtk
> --host=i386-redhat-linux
> Thread model: posix
> gcc version 3.4.6 20060404 (Red Hat 3.4.6-10)
>
Here is the fallback patch if you want to test it.
-hpa
[-- Attachment #2: diff --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 747 bytes --]
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h
index dca9c54..4681459 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h
@@ -332,6 +332,7 @@ static __always_inline __pure bool __static_cpu_has(u8 bit)
#endif
}
+#if __GNUC__ >= 4
#define static_cpu_has(bit) \
( \
__builtin_constant_p(boot_cpu_has(bit)) ? \
@@ -340,6 +341,12 @@ static __always_inline __pure bool __static_cpu_has(u8 bit)
__static_cpu_has(bit) : \
boot_cpu_has(bit) \
)
+#else
+/*
+ * gcc 3.x is too stupid to do the static test; fall back to dynamic.
+ */
+#define static_cpu_has(bit) boot_cpu_has(bit)
+#endif
#endif /* defined(__KERNEL__) && !defined(__ASSEMBLY__) */
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-18 20:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-06 8:45 [PATCH v3 0/2] x86 FPU API Avi Kivity
2010-05-06 8:45 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] x86: eliminate TS_XSAVE Avi Kivity
2010-05-10 20:39 ` [tip:x86/fpu] x86: Eliminate TS_XSAVE tip-bot for Avi Kivity
2010-05-12 0:18 ` [tip:x86/fpu] x86, fpu: Use the proper asm constraint in use_xsave() tip-bot for H. Peter Anvin
2010-05-12 1:06 ` [tip:x86/fpu] x86: Add new static_cpu_has() function using alternatives tip-bot for H. Peter Anvin
2010-05-18 20:10 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-05-18 20:43 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-05-18 20:57 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-05-18 21:11 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-05-18 21:31 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-05-18 21:38 ` Does anyone care about gcc 3.x support for x86 anymore? H. Peter Anvin
2010-05-19 23:10 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2010-05-20 0:39 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-05-20 0:42 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-05-20 12:44 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-05-18 20:58 ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2010-05-18 21:31 ` [tip:x86/fpu] x86: Add new static_cpu_has() function using alternatives Eric Dumazet
2010-05-27 20:12 ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86, cpufeature: Unbreak compile with gcc 3.x tip-bot for H. Peter Anvin
2010-05-12 1:06 ` [tip:x86/fpu] x86, fpu: Use static_cpu_has() to implement use_xsave() tip-bot for H. Peter Anvin
2010-05-06 8:45 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] x86: Introduce 'struct fpu' and related API Avi Kivity
2010-05-10 20:39 ` [tip:x86/fpu] " tip-bot for Avi Kivity
2010-05-10 20:40 ` [tip:x86/fpu] x86, fpu: Unbreak FPU emulation tip-bot for H. Peter Anvin
2010-05-10 8:48 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] x86 FPU API Avi Kivity
2010-05-10 15:24 ` H. Peter Anvin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4BF2FF82.7090005@zytor.com \
--to=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome