From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752363Ab0ESSSd (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 May 2010 14:18:33 -0400 Received: from sinclair.provo.novell.com ([137.65.248.137]:8805 "EHLO sinclair.provo.novell.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751238Ab0ESSSc convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 May 2010 14:18:32 -0400 Message-Id: <4BF3D7130200003000085657@sinclair.provo.novell.com> X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise Internet Agent 8.0.1 Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 12:18:27 -0600 From: "Ky Srinivasan" To: "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: , , "Avi Kivity" , , Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Hyperv detection - code cleanup References: <4BF3C7970200003000085602@sinclair.provo.novell.com> <4BF4252E.6090609@zytor.com> In-Reply-To: <4BF4252E.6090609@zytor.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >>> On 5/19/2010 at 1:51 PM, in message <4BF4252E.6090609@zytor.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" wrote: > On 05/19/2010 10:12 AM, Ky Srinivasan wrote: >> >> From: K. Y. Srinivasan >> Subject: Code cleanup - consolidate all hyperv related definitions into one >> header file. >> > > How will this affect KVM? I was under the impression that this was > separated out as a constants-only header file for a reason. I was under the impression that hyperv.h was for all public definitions of Hyperv. I am hoping Avi can shed some light on KVM implications (if any). Regards, K. Y > > -hpa