mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	eric.dumazet@gmail.com, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, "Siddha\,
	Suresh B" <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Does anyone care about gcc 3.x support for *x86* anymore?
Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 07:08:19 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BF3F0D3.6070609@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <871vd8xb8t.fsf@basil.nowhere.org>

On 05/19/2010 06:38 AM, Andi Kleen wrote:
> "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> writes:
>>
>> If there isn't a reason to preserve support, I would like to consider
>> discontinue support for using gcc 3 to compile x86 kernels.  If there is
>> a valid use case, it would be good to know what it is.
> 
> I suspect there are still distributions around that use it as a standard
> compiler. Wasn't it used in some major release of Debian?
> 
> -Andi

There are, but that doesn't mean it's relevant for people to compile
bleeding-edge kernels with it.

	-hpa

-- 
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel.  I don't speak on their behalf.


  reply	other threads:[~2010-05-19 14:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-05-19  1:19 H. Peter Anvin
2010-05-19  7:13 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-05-19 13:38 ` Andi Kleen
2010-05-19 14:08   ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2010-05-19 22:45     ` Justin P. Mattock
2010-05-20 18:37   ` Martin Michlmayr
2010-05-20 19:56     ` Miguel Ojeda
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-05-06  8:45 [PATCH v3 1/2] x86: eliminate TS_XSAVE Avi Kivity
2010-05-12  1:06 ` [tip:x86/fpu] x86: Add new static_cpu_has() function using alternatives tip-bot for H. Peter Anvin
2010-05-18 20:10   ` Eric Dumazet
2010-05-18 20:57     ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-05-18 21:11       ` Eric Dumazet
2010-05-18 21:38         ` Does anyone care about gcc 3.x support for x86 anymore? H. Peter Anvin
2010-05-19 23:10           ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2010-05-20  0:39             ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-05-20  0:42             ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-05-20 12:44               ` Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4BF3F0D3.6070609@zytor.com \
    --to=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome