From: Kiyoshi Ueda <k-ueda@ct.jp.nec.com>
To: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
Cc: Nikanth Karthikesan <knikanth@suse.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@redhat.com,
Alasdair Kergon <agk@redhat.com>,
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>,
"Jun'ichi Nomura" <j-nomura@ce.jp.nec.com>,
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] dm: only initialize full request_queue for request-based device
Date: Fri, 21 May 2010 17:32:56 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BF64538.6010305@ct.jp.nec.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100520170732.GA22791@redhat.com>
Hi Mike,
On 05/21/2010 02:07 AM +0900, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> Kiyoshi Ueda <k-ueda@ct.jp.nec.com> wrote:
>> On 05/19/2010 11:39 PM +0900, Mike Snitzer wrote:
>>> Thanks again for pointing this out; I'll work to arrive at an
>>> alternative locking scheme. Likely introduce a lock local to the
>>> multiple_device (effectively the 'queue_lock' I had before). But
>>> difference is I'd take that lock before taking _hash_lock.
>>
>> You have to see do_resume(), too.
>> do_resume() gets hc->new_map with _hash_lock held but without your
>> 'queue_lock' held. This could cause inconsistent status;
>> table_load() for bio-based table do_resume() for rq-based table
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>> dm_lock_md_queue(md)
>> dm_table_setup_md_queue(t) (<= bio-based)
>> dm_clear_request_based_queue(md)
>> md->queue->request_fn = NULL
>> down_write(_hash_lock)
>> new_map = hc->new_map (<= rq-based)
>> up_write(_hash_lock)
>> dm_swap_table(md, new_map)
>> __bind(md, new_map) (<= rq-based)
>> down_write(_hash_lock)
>> hc->new_map = t
>> up_write(_hash_lock)
>> dm_unlock_md_queue(md)
snip
>>>>> Also, your patch changes the queue configuration even when a table is
>>>>> already active and used. (e.g. Loading bio-based table to a mapped_device
>>>>> which is already active/used as request-based sets q->requst_fn in NULL.)
>>>>> That could cause some critical problems.
>>>>
>>>> Yes, that is possible and I can add additional checks to prevent this.
>>>> But this speaks to a more general problem with the existing DM code.
>>>>
>>>> dm_swap_table() has the negative check to prevent such table loads, e.g.:
>>>> /* cannot change the device type, once a table is bound */
>>>>
>>>> This check should come during table_load, as part of
>>>> dm_table_set_type(), rather than during table resume.
>>>
>>> I'll look to address this issue in v6 too.
>>
>> It can race between table_load() and do_resume() as well;
>> table_load() for bio-based do_resume() for rq-based
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> dm_table_set_type(t) (<= bio-based)
>> live_table = dm_get_live_table(md)
>> (assume no live_table yet)
>> new_map = hc->new_map (<= rq-based)
>> dm_swap_table(md, new_map)
>> __bind(md, new_map)
>> dm_table_setup_md_queue(t)
>> dm_clear_request_based_queue(md)
>> md->queue->request_fn = NULL
>
> Understood.
>
> I've addressed the above races by:
> 1) properly protecting md->queue during do_resume(). Both do_resume()
> and table_load() first take md->queue_lock and then _hash_lock.
> 2) adding a negative check for an existing live table to
> dm_table_setup_md_queue().
>
> I will mail out v7 after I've given it additional review.
dm_table_setup_md_queue() may allocate memory with blocking mode
inside md->queue_lock which is needed to resume the md.
That could cause a deadlock which doesn't happen in the current model;
e.g:
- Assume a bio-based table has been already loaded in hc->new_map
and no live table yet in a mapped_device.
- Load a request-based table and then no memory situation happens
in dm_table_setup_md_queue().
- Then, the mapped_device can't be resumed even in the case that
resuming the mapped_device with the preloaded bio-based table
can make some memory by writeback.
=> deadlock
Thanks,
Kiyoshi Ueda
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-21 8:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-10 22:55 [RFC PATCH 1/2] block: allow initialization of previously allocated request_queue Mike Snitzer
2010-05-10 22:55 ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] dm: only initialize full request_queue for request-based device Mike Snitzer
2010-05-11 4:23 ` Kiyoshi Ueda
2010-05-11 13:15 ` Mike Snitzer
2010-05-12 8:23 ` Kiyoshi Ueda
2010-05-13 3:57 ` Mike Snitzer
2010-05-14 8:06 ` Kiyoshi Ueda
2010-05-14 14:08 ` Mike Snitzer
2010-05-17 9:27 ` Kiyoshi Ueda
2010-05-17 17:27 ` Mike Snitzer
2010-05-18 8:32 ` Kiyoshi Ueda
2010-05-18 13:46 ` Mike Snitzer
2010-05-19 5:57 ` Kiyoshi Ueda
2010-05-19 12:01 ` Mike Snitzer
2010-05-19 14:39 ` Mike Snitzer
2010-05-19 14:45 ` Mike Snitzer
2010-05-20 11:21 ` Kiyoshi Ueda
2010-05-20 17:07 ` Mike Snitzer
2010-05-21 8:32 ` Kiyoshi Ueda [this message]
2010-05-21 13:34 ` Mike Snitzer
2010-05-24 9:58 ` Kiyoshi Ueda
2010-05-19 21:51 ` Mike Snitzer
2010-05-13 4:31 ` [PATCH 2/2 v2] " Mike Snitzer
2010-05-13 5:02 ` [RFC PATCH 3/2] dm: bio-based device must not register elevator in sysfs Mike Snitzer
2010-05-13 22:14 ` [PATCH 3/2 v2] " Mike Snitzer
2010-05-11 6:55 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] block: allow initialization of previously allocated request_queue Jens Axboe
2010-05-11 13:18 ` Mike Snitzer
2010-05-11 13:21 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4BF64538.6010305@ct.jp.nec.com \
--to=k-ueda@ct.jp.nec.com \
--cc=agk@redhat.com \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=j-nomura@ce.jp.nec.com \
--cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=knikanth@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
--cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome