From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753318Ab0EVJe1 (ORCPT ); Sat, 22 May 2010 05:34:27 -0400 Received: from LION.seas.upenn.edu ([158.130.12.194]:51428 "EHLO lion.seas.upenn.edu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752275Ab0EVJeZ (ORCPT ); Sat, 22 May 2010 05:34:25 -0400 Message-ID: <4BF7A4E8.3050806@seas.upenn.edu> Date: Sat, 22 May 2010 05:33:28 -0400 From: Rafi Rubin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100411 Icedove/3.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Henrik Rydberg CC: Dmitry Torokhov , Ping Cheng , Andrew Morton , linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mika Kuoppala , Peter Hutterer , Benjamin Tissoires , Stephane Chatty , Michael Poole Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] input: mt: Document the MT event slot protocol (rev3) References: <1274457354-5570-1-git-send-email-rydberg@euromail.se> <4BF6B673.1080507@euromail.se> <20100521165218.GA26439@core.coreip.homeip.net> <4BF6BB43.2020405@euromail.se> <20100521172222.GB26439@core.coreip.homeip.net> <4BF6C303.7030804@euromail.se> <20100521174140.GA23155@core.coreip.homeip.net> <4BF6C7B6.2020008@euromail.se> In-Reply-To: <4BF6C7B6.2020008@euromail.se> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 05/21/10 13:49, Henrik Rydberg wrote: > Dmitry Torokhov wrote: >> >> I guess this is where our disconnect lies as when I am looking at the >> event names I view all *_MT_* events as related to the multitouch >> protocol handling. >> > > Yes. It is true that slot control is MT related, but I am looking at this from > the perspective of future expansions like KEY_MT, KEY_REL, and such, finding a > way to signal to user space which events are handled via slots. If we had > ABS_MT_SLOT, we would most likely get applications which store ABS_MT_SLOT as an > attribute of the slot together with ABS_MT_POSITION_X, ABS_MT_TOUCH_MAJOR, etc, > which is just not right. So the proposal is ABS_SLOT. May we have your verdict, > please. :-) > > Henrik > How many fingers can type on cap of a key? (sorry, couldn't resist). Seems to me like part of the problem here is still the overlap between tracking id and slot id. Rafi