mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Eduard - Gabriel Munteanu <eduard.munteanu@linux360.ro>
Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
	Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@canonical.com>,
	Prasad <prasad@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Soeren Sandmann <sandmann@daimi.au.dk>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Tracing configuration review
Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 17:12:18 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BFCE5F2.4070906@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100526084201.GA22438@localhost>

Eduard - Gabriel Munteanu wrote:
> On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 03:20:16PM +0800, Li Zefan wrote:
>> Pekka Enberg wrote:
>>> On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 11:13 PM, Frederic Weisbecker
>>> <fweisbec@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> # CONFIG_KMEMTRACE is not set (Kconfig says N if unsure)
>>>> Deprecated. We have the kmem trace event that are a full replacement now.
>>>> Pekka, Gabriel, can we remove it now?
>>> I don't think ftrace supports boot-time tracing which kmemtrace did.
>> We can do boot-time tracing by passing "trace_event=" kernel parameter.
>>
>> By passing "ftrace=kmemtrace", kmemtrace can be started when
>> calling tracer_alloc_buffer(), which is an early_initcall.
>> While trace events are inititialized as a fs_initcall,  it can
>> be modified to an early_initcall.
>>
>> Furthermore, I noticed the discussion on perf persistent events, which
>> seems to enable perf trace at boot time, so I think perf-kmem can take
>> advantage of this and will be a full-replacement of kmemtrace soon ?
>>
>>> That said, I was probably the only one actually using the feature so
>>> maybe we can just nuke kmemtrace at this point...
>> If you agree on removing kmemtrace now, I'll re-send the patch.
> 
> I don't understand... wasn't the old kmemtrace (the relayfs based stuff)
> removed a long time ago? Right now it's just the hooks and code that
> sets up tracing and printers.
> 
> Or does it happen that that code isn't necessary for 'perf kmem' to do
> its job?
> 

Yes, actually the code has nothing to do with perf-kmem.

> And yeah, I'm all for the perf stuff, kmemtrace-user (the out-of-tree
> userspace tools) has been obsolete since the shift to ftrace.
> 
> As for early tracing, that was possible with the relayfs variant, it
> required only the SLAB layer to be up IIRC. But that stopped working
> once it got converted to ftrace (kmemtrace_init() is a nop).
> 

Ah, thanks for making this clear, so there's no such early tracing
feature that acts as a barrier in removing kmemtrace.


      reply	other threads:[~2010-05-26  9:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-05-25 19:31 Chase Douglas
2010-05-25 19:46 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-05-25 19:58   ` Chase Douglas
2010-05-25 20:20     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-05-25 20:17   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-05-25 22:01     ` Steven Rostedt
2010-05-25 23:13       ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-05-26 10:57     ` [Patch] tracing: remove boot tracer Américo Wang
2010-05-26 15:49       ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-05-25 20:13 ` Tracing configuration review Frederic Weisbecker
2010-05-25 21:09   ` Chase Douglas
2010-05-25 23:06     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-05-27 11:20       ` K.Prasad
2010-05-27 22:15         ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-06-08 17:35     ` Randy Dunlap
2010-06-08 22:00       ` Chase Douglas
2010-06-11 21:51         ` Randy Dunlap
2010-06-14  2:41           ` Chase Douglas
2010-05-26  6:19   ` Pekka Enberg
2010-05-26  7:20     ` Li Zefan
2010-05-26  7:44       ` Pekka Enberg
2010-05-26  8:42       ` Eduard - Gabriel Munteanu
2010-05-26  9:12         ` Li Zefan [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4BFCE5F2.4070906@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --to=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=chase.douglas@canonical.com \
    --cc=eduard.munteanu@linux360.ro \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
    --cc=prasad@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=sandmann@daimi.au.dk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome