From: Nigel Cunningham <ncunningham@crca.org.au>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: pm list <linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
TuxOnIce-devel <tuxonice-devel@tuxonice.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Preallocate swap + minor fix.
Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 11:31:46 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BFDCB82.6030908@crca.org.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201005262321.09971.rjw@sisk.pl>
Hi.
On 27/05/10 07:21, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wednesday 26 May 2010, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
>> Hi all.
>>
>> In current in-kernel hibernation code, swap is allocated as the image is
>> being written.
>>
>> The first four patches in this series rework things so that all swap
>> that will be used is allocated prior to any data being written to disk.
>> The fourth patch might look like too much for one patch, but it's
>> necessary to not break bisecting.
>>
>> The fifth patch fixes a minor error in displaying the speed at which I/O
>> occurred.
>>
>> This is the beginning of what I hope will be a long series of sets of
>> patches, first working towards adding support for properly asynchronous
>> I/O (not batching, as is currently done), then compression, multiple
>> swap devices and more. In short, this is the beginning of work on
>> merging TuxOnIce functionality a bit at a time.
>>
>> The work is coming now because I recently finished my previous job, so
>> I'm seeking to get some of those jobs I've been wanting to do for a long
>> time out of the way. If anyone wants to employ me to do this work, I
>> wouldn't say no! :)
>>
>> Please excuse me if there are wrapping issues with the patches - I'm
>> using Thunderbird, and haven't sent a patch series for quite a while, so
>> don't remember the fancy git mailer way (will have to look it up).
>>
>> Rafael, these and future patches will be available at:
>>
>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/nigelc/tuxonice-head.git#for-rafael
>
> Thanks for the patches, I'll have a look at them as soon as I can.
Thank you! I've got other stuff to work on today, but hope to prepare
another set of patches tomorrow.
> I haven't replied to your hibernation algorithm idea, mostly because I didn't
> have the time to look into it more thoroughly and I don't remember all of the
> details. I'm still going to reply to it, though.
Thanks.
Nigel
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-27 1:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-26 7:09 Nigel Cunningham
2010-05-26 21:21 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-05-27 1:31 ` Nigel Cunningham [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4BFDCB82.6030908@crca.org.au \
--to=ncunningham@crca.org.au \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=tuxonice-devel@tuxonice.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome