From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
To: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>
Cc: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>,
"xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
Don Dutile <ddutile@redhat.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 11/11] Unplug emulated disks and nics
Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 10:51:25 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BFEB11D.9080805@goop.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <19454.34430.471499.222290@mariner.uk.xensource.com>
On 05/27/2010 07:49 AM, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Stefano Stabellini writes ("[Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 11/11] Unplug emulated disks and nics"):
>
>> On Wed, 26 May 2010, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>>
>>> Wow, this interface is perverse. It reuses the same IO port but changes
>>> function depending on the size of the IO? Again, wow.
>>>
>>
>> Yeah, before you ask, I didn't write it :)
>>
> Yes, neither did I :-). However, I did document it and now I also
> maintain the "product number" registry. Did you find the interface
> spec ? Enclosed below in case not.
>
Thanks. We should probably start a Documentation/xen/ and put this in
there as part of the patch.
> I hereby allocate you ("pvops PV-on-HVM Linux, upstream") product
> number 3. Does the kernel have a way to distinguish between upstream
> and other versions ? Eg, there's the kernel version name suffix
> thingy if I remember rightly. Perhaps we should allocate a different
> number for "some pvops pv-on-hvm Linux with a nonempty kernel version
> name suffix". Please advise.
>
> You are welcome to use whatever you like for the "build number".
> Perhaps the best thing would a two-byte encoding of the kernel version
> number if that is possible. As the purpose is logging and
> blacklisting, it's not that critical although it's better to reuse the
> same number for excessively similar builds than to use a random scheme
> which might generate accidental clashes between unrelated versions.
>
We could include 2 bytes of the HEAD changeset or something, with some
risk of collision. Or just choose a constant and stick with it until
some interesting qualitative driver change makes it worthwhile bumping
the version.
I guess I can see some value in this info for recording in a log to do
some diagnostics, but the whole blacklist concept seems highly dubious
to me. Some kind of feature negotiation makes a lot more sense to me...
J
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-27 17:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-24 18:25 [PATCH 0 of 12] PV on HVM Xen Stefano Stabellini
2010-05-24 18:27 ` [PATCH 01/11] Add support for hvm_op Stefano Stabellini
2010-05-24 18:27 ` [PATCH 02/11] early PV on HVM Stefano Stabellini
2010-05-24 18:27 ` [PATCH 03/11] evtchn delivery " Stefano Stabellini
2010-05-24 18:27 ` [PATCH 04/11] Fix find_unbound_irq in presence of ioapic irqs Stefano Stabellini
2010-05-26 18:26 ` [Xen-devel] " Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2010-05-27 14:49 ` Stefano Stabellini
2010-05-27 15:36 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2010-05-24 18:27 ` [PATCH 05/11] Xen PCI platform device driver Stefano Stabellini
2010-05-28 8:55 ` [Xen-devel] " Zhigang Wang
2010-05-28 14:18 ` Stefano Stabellini
2010-05-24 18:27 ` [PATCH 06/11] Add suspend\resume support for PV on HVM guests Stefano Stabellini
2010-05-25 20:20 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2010-05-24 18:27 ` [PATCH 07/11] Allow xen platform pci device to be compiled as a module Stefano Stabellini
2010-05-24 18:27 ` [PATCH 08/11] Fix possible NULL pointer dereference in print_IO_APIC Stefano Stabellini
2010-05-24 18:27 ` [PATCH 09/11] __setup_vector_irq: handle NULL chip_data Stefano Stabellini
2010-05-24 18:27 ` [PATCH 10/11] Support VIRQ_TIMER and pvclock on HVM Stefano Stabellini
2010-05-25 20:24 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2010-05-26 13:08 ` Stefano Stabellini
2010-05-24 18:27 ` [PATCH 11/11] Unplug emulated disks and nics Stefano Stabellini
2010-05-25 20:31 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2010-05-26 12:27 ` Stefano Stabellini
2010-05-26 20:59 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2010-05-27 12:29 ` Stefano Stabellini
[not found] ` <m2n.s.1OHcBK-0018DA@chiark.greenend.org.uk>
2010-05-27 14:49 ` [Xen-devel] " Ian Jackson
2010-05-27 17:25 ` Stefano Stabellini
2010-05-27 17:51 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge [this message]
2010-05-27 18:10 ` Stefano Stabellini
2010-05-24 18:29 ` [PATCH 0 of 12] PV on HVM Xen Stefano Stabellini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4BFEB11D.9080805@goop.org \
--to=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=ddutile@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome