mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz>
To: Andy Whitcroft <apw@canonical.com>
Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>,
	linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] kbuild: fix LOCALVERSION handling to match description
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 14:19:32 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C161E54.2050105@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1276508470-21731-1-git-send-email-apw@canonical.com>

On 14.6.2010 11:41, Andy Whitcroft wrote:
> In the commit below the version string handling was modified, adding
> a '+' where no other version information was supplied:
> 
>     commit 85a256d8e0116c8f5ad276730830f5d4d473344d
>     Author: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
>     Date:   Wed Jan 13 13:01:05 2010 -0800
> 
> From the commit the intent was as below:
> 
>      - when CONFIG_LOCALVERSION_AUTO is disabled, a `+' is appended if the
>        repository has been revised beyond a tagged commit and LOCALVERSION=
>        was not passed to "make".
> 
> However if the user supplies an empty LOCALVERSION on the command line
> the plus suffix is still added.  This form is useful in the case where
> the build environment knows that the version as specified is correct and
> complete but does not correspond to a specific tag.
> 
> This patch changes the implementation to match the documentation
> such that specifying LOCALVERSION= on the build line is sufficient
> to suppress any suffix.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andy Whitcroft <apw@canonical.com>
> ---
>  Makefile |    2 +-
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
> index d49d96c..662e820 100644
> --- a/Makefile
> +++ b/Makefile
> @@ -944,7 +944,7 @@ ifdef CONFIG_LOCALVERSION_AUTO
>  	localver-extra = $(scm-identifier)
>  else
>  	ifneq ($(scm-identifier),)
> -		ifeq ($(LOCALVERSION),)
> +		ifeq ("$(origin LOCALVERSION)", "undefined")
>  			localver-extra = +
>  		endif
>  	endif

David, do you Ack this change? To me this seems like a reasonable
compromise.

Michal


  reply	other threads:[~2010-06-14 12:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-06-14  9:41 Andy Whitcroft
2010-06-14 12:19 ` Michal Marek [this message]
2010-06-14 20:26 ` David Rientjes

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4C161E54.2050105@suse.cz \
    --to=mmarek@suse.cz \
    --cc=apw@canonical.com \
    --cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome