From: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
KVM list <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v5 2/9] KVM: MMU: fix race between 'walk_addr' and 'fetch'
Date: Tue, 06 Jul 2010 18:45:28 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C330948.1070305@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C330918.6040709@cn.fujitsu.com>
'walk_addr' is out of mmu_lock's protection, so while we handle 'fetch',
then guest's mapping has modifited by other vcpu's write path, such as
invlpg, pte_write and other fetch path
Fixed by checking all level's mapping
Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/paging_tmpl.h | 73 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
1 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/paging_tmpl.h b/arch/x86/kvm/paging_tmpl.h
index 19f0077..f58a5c4 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/paging_tmpl.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/paging_tmpl.h
@@ -300,7 +300,7 @@ static u64 *FNAME(fetch)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gva_t addr,
int *ptwrite, pfn_t pfn)
{
unsigned access = gw->pt_access;
- struct kvm_mmu_page *sp;
+ struct kvm_mmu_page *sp = NULL;
u64 spte, *sptep = NULL;
int direct;
gfn_t table_gfn;
@@ -319,22 +319,23 @@ static u64 *FNAME(fetch)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gva_t addr,
direct_access &= ~ACC_WRITE_MASK;
for_each_shadow_entry(vcpu, addr, iterator) {
+ bool nonpresent = false, last_mapping = false;
+
level = iterator.level;
sptep = iterator.sptep;
- if (iterator.level == hlevel) {
- mmu_set_spte(vcpu, sptep, access,
- gw->pte_access & access,
- user_fault, write_fault,
- dirty, ptwrite, level,
- gw->gfn, pfn, false, true);
- break;
+
+ if (level == hlevel) {
+ last_mapping = true;
+ goto check_set_spte;
}
- if (is_shadow_present_pte(*sptep) && !is_large_pte(*sptep)) {
- struct kvm_mmu_page *child;
+ if (is_large_pte(*sptep)) {
+ drop_spte(vcpu->kvm, sptep, shadow_trap_nonpresent_pte);
+ kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(vcpu->kvm);
+ }
- if (level != gw->level)
- continue;
+ if (is_shadow_present_pte(*sptep) && level == gw->level) {
+ struct kvm_mmu_page *child;
/*
* For the direct sp, if the guest pte's dirty bit
@@ -344,19 +345,17 @@ static u64 *FNAME(fetch)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gva_t addr,
* a new sp with the correct access.
*/
child = page_header(*sptep & PT64_BASE_ADDR_MASK);
- if (child->role.access == direct_access)
- continue;
-
- mmu_page_remove_parent_pte(child, sptep);
- __set_spte(sptep, shadow_trap_nonpresent_pte);
- kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(vcpu->kvm);
+ if (child->role.access != direct_access) {
+ mmu_page_remove_parent_pte(child, sptep);
+ __set_spte(sptep, shadow_trap_nonpresent_pte);
+ kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(vcpu->kvm);
+ }
}
- if (is_large_pte(*sptep)) {
- drop_spte(vcpu->kvm, sptep, shadow_trap_nonpresent_pte);
- kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(vcpu->kvm);
- }
+ if (is_shadow_present_pte(*sptep))
+ goto check_set_spte;
+ nonpresent = true;
if (level <= gw->level) {
direct = 1;
access = direct_access;
@@ -374,22 +373,36 @@ static u64 *FNAME(fetch)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gva_t addr,
}
sp = kvm_mmu_get_page(vcpu, table_gfn, addr, level-1,
direct, access, sptep);
- if (!direct) {
+check_set_spte:
+ if (level >= gw->level) {
r = kvm_read_guest_atomic(vcpu->kvm,
- gw->pte_gpa[level - 2],
+ gw->pte_gpa[level - 1],
&curr_pte, sizeof(curr_pte));
- if (r || curr_pte != gw->ptes[level - 2]) {
- kvm_mmu_put_page(sp, sptep);
+ if (r || curr_pte != gw->ptes[level - 1]) {
+ if (nonpresent)
+ kvm_mmu_put_page(sp, sptep);
kvm_release_pfn_clean(pfn);
sptep = NULL;
break;
}
}
- spte = __pa(sp->spt)
- | PT_PRESENT_MASK | PT_ACCESSED_MASK
- | PT_WRITABLE_MASK | PT_USER_MASK;
- *sptep = spte;
+ if (nonpresent) {
+ spte = __pa(sp->spt)
+ | PT_PRESENT_MASK | PT_ACCESSED_MASK
+ | PT_WRITABLE_MASK | PT_USER_MASK;
+ *sptep = spte;
+ continue;
+ }
+
+ if (last_mapping) {
+ mmu_set_spte(vcpu, sptep, access,
+ gw->pte_access & access,
+ user_fault, write_fault,
+ dirty, ptwrite, level,
+ gw->gfn, pfn, false, true);
+ break;
+ }
}
return sptep;
--
1.6.1.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-06 10:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-06 10:44 [PATCH v5 1/9] KVM: MMU: fix forgot reserved bits check in speculative path Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-06 10:45 ` Xiao Guangrong [this message]
2010-07-06 10:46 ` [PATCH v5 3/9] export __get_user_pages_fast() function Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-11 12:52 ` [PATCH v5 2/9] KVM: MMU: fix race between 'walk_addr' and 'fetch' Avi Kivity
2010-07-11 15:40 ` Avi Kivity
2010-07-06 10:47 ` [PATCH v5 4/9] KVM: MMU: introduce gfn_to_pfn_atomic() function Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-06 11:22 ` Gleb Natapov
2010-07-06 11:28 ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-09 1:34 ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-06 10:48 ` [PATCH v5 5/9] KVM: MMU: introduce gfn_to_page_many_atomic() function Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-11 12:59 ` Avi Kivity
2010-07-12 2:55 ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-12 12:28 ` Avi Kivity
2010-07-13 1:17 ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-06 10:49 ` [PATCH v5 6/9] KVM: MMU: introduce pte_prefetch_topup_memory_cache() Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-11 13:05 ` Avi Kivity
2010-07-12 3:05 ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-12 12:26 ` Avi Kivity
2010-07-13 1:16 ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-13 4:21 ` Avi Kivity
2010-07-13 4:25 ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-13 5:35 ` Avi Kivity
2010-07-13 5:48 ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-13 6:05 ` Avi Kivity
2010-07-13 6:10 ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-13 6:29 ` Avi Kivity
2010-07-13 6:52 ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-13 7:45 ` Avi Kivity
2010-07-06 10:50 ` [PATCH v5 7/9] KVM: MMU: prefetch ptes when intercepted guest #PF Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-06 10:51 ` [PATCH v5 8/9] KVM: MMU: combine guest pte read between fetch and pte prefetch Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-06 19:52 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-07-07 1:23 ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-07 13:07 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-07-07 13:11 ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-07 13:40 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-07-07 14:10 ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-07 15:30 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-07-06 10:52 ` [PATCH v5 9/9] KVM: MMU: trace " Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-11 12:24 ` [PATCH v5 1/9] KVM: MMU: fix forgot reserved bits check in speculative path Avi Kivity
2010-07-12 2:37 ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-12 13:15 ` Avi Kivity
2010-07-13 1:57 ` Xiao Guangrong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C330948.1070305@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome