From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: remove __phys_reloc_hide
Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2010 11:56:48 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C604F70.1040902@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100809080723.GD24221@elte.hu>
On 08/09/2010 01:07 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Namhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> remove unnecessary use of RELOC_HIDE(). It only does simple addition of ptr
>> and offset, and in this case, offset 0, does nothing. It does NOT do anything
>> with linker relocation things. I could find no reason to use it.
>>
>> The only user of __phys_reloc_hide() was __pa_symbol() so it can be removed
>> safely here.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> arch/x86/include/asm/page.h | 5 ++---
>> arch/x86/include/asm/page_32.h | 1 -
>> arch/x86/include/asm/page_64_types.h | 1 -
>> 3 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> We do this as a general Voodoo barrier against GCC miscompilations.
>
> You are right that it's largely moot by today (and especially so on x86 - i
> only remember a single instance of miscompilation that Rusty mentioned few
> years ago, and that was on powerpc), but the wrapper is simple enough, so
> unless there's some real tangible improvement in the binary output we might as
> well keep it.
>
> Peter, what do you think?
>
I agree... I suspect it might make some difference for gcc 3 stragglers.
-hpa
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-08-09 18:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-08-08 21:38 Namhyung Kim
2010-08-09 6:22 ` Andi Kleen
2010-08-09 6:40 ` Namhyung Kim
2010-08-09 6:44 ` Andi Kleen
2010-08-09 7:04 ` Namhyung Kim
2010-08-09 7:22 ` Andi Kleen
2010-08-09 7:47 ` Namhyung Kim
2010-08-09 18:56 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-08-10 7:05 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-08-10 10:46 ` Namhyung Kim
2010-08-11 5:44 ` Namhyung Kim
2010-08-11 19:09 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-08-11 6:37 ` [PATCH] x86: add a comment to __pa_symbol Namhyung Kim
2010-08-11 7:44 ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86: Document __phys_reloc_hide() usage in __pa_symbol() tip-bot for Namhyung Kim
2018-06-19 23:00 ` [PATCH] x86: remove __phys_reloc_hide Thomas Gleixner
2010-08-09 8:07 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-08-09 18:56 ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C604F70.1040902@zytor.com \
--to=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@gmail.com \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome