mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Micha Nelissen <micha@neli.hopto.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Why is get_user_pages so slow?
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2010 21:50:18 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C61AD7A.7040400@neli.hopto.org> (raw)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 749 bytes --]

Hi all,

Why is get_user_pages much slower than taking the faults? (I would 
expect it to be faster).

Attached example program first mallocs a piece of memory (64MB in this 
case) then reads it "to take the faults". Afterwards, it uses mmap with 
MAP_POPULATE to "speed up" and not to have to take the faults, but have 
everything mapped in one go. I think mmap is using get_user_pages in 
this case.

$ ./memspeed
malloc took 0 msecs
read took 14 msecs
write took 0 msecs
free took 1 msecs
mmap took 45 msecs
munmap took 5 msecs

Using MAP_POPULATE is 3 times as slow as the 'stupid' implementation! 
I'm running a Core 2 duo e6300 system with linux 2.6.28.4.

Am I doing something wrong? MAP_POPULATE seems a bit of a joke to me.

Thanks,

Micha

[-- Attachment #2: memspeed.c --]
[-- Type: text/x-csrc, Size: 1584 bytes --]

#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <sys/mman.h>
#include <sys/time.h>

#define SIZE (64 << 20)

unsigned tv_msecs(struct timeval *tvs, struct timeval *tve)
{
        return (tve->tv_sec - tvs->tv_sec) * 1000 +
                (tve->tv_usec - tvs->tv_usec) / 1000;
}

int main(void)
{
        struct timeval tvs, tve;
        void *buf;
        int *p, *e, i;

        gettimeofday(&tvs, NULL);
        buf = malloc(SIZE);
        gettimeofday(&tve, NULL);
        printf("malloc took %d msecs\n", tv_msecs(&tvs, &tve));

        gettimeofday(&tvs, NULL);
        for (p = buf, e = buf + SIZE; p < e; p += 0x1000)
                i = *(volatile int*)p;
        gettimeofday(&tve, NULL);
        printf("read took %d msecs\n", tv_msecs(&tvs, &tve));

        gettimeofday(&tvs, NULL);
        for (p = buf, e = buf + SIZE; p < e; p += 0x1000)
                *(volatile int*)p = 0xaa55aa55;
        gettimeofday(&tve, NULL);
        printf("write took %d msecs\n", tv_msecs(&tvs, &tve));

        gettimeofday(&tvs, NULL);
        free(buf);
        gettimeofday(&tve, NULL);
        printf("free took %d msecs\n", tv_msecs(&tvs, &tve));

        gettimeofday(&tvs, NULL);
        buf = mmap(NULL, SIZE, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE |
                MAP_ANONYMOUS | MAP_POPULATE, -1, 0);
        gettimeofday(&tve, NULL);
        printf("mmap took %d msecs\n", tv_msecs(&tvs, &tve));

        gettimeofday(&tvs, NULL);
        munmap(buf, SIZE);
        gettimeofday(&tve, NULL);
        printf("munmap took %d msecs\n", tv_msecs(&tvs, &tve));

        return 0;
}

             reply	other threads:[~2010-08-10 19:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-08-10 19:50 Micha Nelissen [this message]
2010-08-12  3:43 ` Kevin Easton
2010-08-12 10:08   ` Micha Nelissen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4C61AD7A.7040400@neli.hopto.org \
    --to=micha@neli.hopto.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®