mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Oberparleiter <oberpar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>,
	Jens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>, unsik Kim <donari75@gmail.com>,
	Martin Schwidefsky <mschwid2@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Heiko Carstens <heicars2@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [RFC] Switching block device elevators
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 16:52:35 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C6950B3.8020702@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)

After commit 1abec4fdbb142e3ccb6ce99832fae42129134a96, "block: make 
blk_init_free_list and elevator_init idempotent", we're seeing kernel 
panics in our s390 tape block device driver. The panic is triggered 
because our driver tries to replace the default elevator with a noop 
elevator by calling elevator_exit() directly followed by elevator_init().

Since the commit, elevator_init() returns 0 if request_queue->elevator 
is non-null, even though it does not install a new elevator. As a 
result, the next access to the elevator finds a pointer to the old one 
which was already freed and a panic is triggered. Our current fix 
consists of setting the elevator pointer to NULL after elevator_exit().

There is at least one other driver where the problem currently exists 
(drivers/block/mg_disk.c, author on cc) and another s390 driver where 
the problem was only accidentally fixed before 2.6.35. I'm wondering if 
there's a better solution (apart from not forcing an elevator) and would 
like to hear everyone's opinion on this matter. How about declaring 
elevator_switch() non-static, for example?


Regards,
   Peter Oberparleiter


             reply	other threads:[~2010-08-16 14:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-08-16 14:52 Peter Oberparleiter [this message]
2010-08-16 15:44 ` Mike Snitzer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4C6950B3.8020702@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=oberpar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=donari75@gmail.com \
    --cc=heicars2@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=jaxboe@fusionio.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mschwid2@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome