From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753086Ab0HZSRF (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Aug 2010 14:17:05 -0400 Received: from courier.cs.helsinki.fi ([128.214.9.1]:50290 "EHLO mail.cs.helsinki.fi" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752813Ab0HZSRD (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Aug 2010 14:17:03 -0400 Message-ID: <4C76AF8D.2030507@cs.helsinki.fi> Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2010 21:16:45 +0300 From: Pekka Enberg User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.4; en-US; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100802 Thunderbird/3.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Christoph Lameter CC: David Rientjes , Stephen Rothwell , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Tejun Heo Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (slab tree related) References: <20100824120714.8918f8de.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <4C740450.3030000@cs.helsinki.fi> <20100825101320.bed89b2a.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <4C74A01E.1060809@cs.helsinki.fi> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 26.8.2010 17.41, Christoph Lameter wrote: > On Wed, 25 Aug 2010, David Rientjes wrote: > >> I'm really hoping that we can remove this hack soon when the percpu >> allocator can handle these allocations on UP without any specialized slab >> behavior. > > So do I. Here is a slightly less hacky version through using > kmalloc_large instead: Applied and queued to -next.