From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752560Ab0IFIez (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Sep 2010 04:34:55 -0400 Received: from vpn.id2.novell.com ([195.33.99.129]:36915 "EHLO vpn.id2.novell.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752139Ab0IFIey convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Sep 2010 04:34:54 -0400 Message-Id: <4C84C3CA0200007800014730@vpn.id2.novell.com> X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise Internet Agent 8.0.1 Date: Mon, 06 Sep 2010 09:34:50 +0100 From: "Jan Beulich" To: "Rusty Russell" Cc: "Andrew Morton" , "Michal Marek" , Subject: Re: [PATCH] no need to align .modinfo strings References: <4C7FB3A80200007800013F22@vpn.id2.novell.com> <201009061749.56921.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> In-Reply-To: <201009061749.56921.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >>> On 06.09.10 at 10:19, Rusty Russell wrote: > On Thu, 2 Sep 2010 09:54:40 pm Jan Beulich wrote: >> Their use is not performance critical, and hence it seems better to >> save some space. >> >> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich > > Acked-by: Rusty Russell > > The real question is: why is gcc aligning these? Should it be aligning A performance consideration for those cases where strings are being used a lot, I believe. > any string literals at all? If so, should we look for other such wastes > of space? I think we should, at least I'm keeping an eye open to spot any such. Jan