From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932597Ab2DTScD (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Apr 2012 14:32:03 -0400 Received: from gate.crashing.org ([63.228.1.57]:54173 "EHLO gate.crashing.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754011Ab2DTSb7 (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Apr 2012 14:31:59 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCHv24 00/16] Contiguous Memory Allocator Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1257) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Kumar Gala In-Reply-To: <20120419124044.632bfa49.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 13:31:12 -0500 Cc: Marek Szyprowski , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org, Michal Nazarewicz , Kyungmin Park , Russell King , KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki , Daniel Walker , Mel Gorman , Arnd Bergmann , Jesse Barker , Jonathan Corbet , Chunsang Jeong , Dave Hansen , Benjamin Gaignard , Rob Clark , Ohad Ben-Cohen , Sandeep Patil Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <4C95F6F5-3B10-42FE-92B7-C1E8AE6A1820@kernel.crashing.org> References: <1333462221-3987-1-git-send-email-m.szyprowski@samsung.com> <20120419124044.632bfa49.akpm@linux-foundation.org> To: Andrew Morton X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1257) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Apr 19, 2012, at 2:40 PM, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Tue, 03 Apr 2012 16:10:05 +0200 > Marek Szyprowski wrote: > >> This is (yet another) update of CMA patches. > > Looks OK to me. It's a lot of code. > > Please move it into linux-next, and if all is well, ask Linus to pull > the tree into 3.5-rc1. Please be sure to cc me on that email. > > I suggest that you include additional patches which enable CMA as much > as possible on as many architectures as possible so that it gets > maximum coverage testing in linux-next. Remove those Kconfig patches > when merging upstream. > > All this code will probably mess up my tree, but I'll work that out. > It would be more awkward if the CMA code were to later disappear from > linux-next or were not merged into 3.5-rc1. Let's avoid that. I'm looking at the patches to see if I can contribute arch support for PPC. - k