From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756969Ab0IYVVJ (ORCPT ); Sat, 25 Sep 2010 17:21:09 -0400 Received: from tuxonice.net ([74.207.252.127]:46644 "EHLO mail.tuxonice.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750824Ab0IYVVI (ORCPT ); Sat, 25 Sep 2010 17:21:08 -0400 X-Bogosity: Ham, spamicity=0.000000 Message-ID: <4C9E67C1.5030202@tuxonice.net> Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 07:21:05 +1000 From: Nigel Cunningham User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.10pre) Gecko/20100903 Shredder/3.1.4pre MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Martin Steigerwald CC: linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" , LKML , TuxOnIce-devel Subject: Re: [linux-pm] Nigel's current for-rafael queue References: <1285388224-10012-1-git-send-email-nigel@tuxonice.net> (sfid-20100925_095715_038909_A9814B83) <201009251704.50186.Martin@lichtvoll.de> In-Reply-To: <201009251704.50186.Martin@lichtvoll.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi again. (I know from your more recent email that you already know the answer to this, but others might be interested so I'll reply anyway). On 26/09/10 01:04, Martin Steigerwald wrote: > Am Samstag 25 September 2010 schrieb Nigel Cunningham: >> Hi Rafael. > > Hi Nigel, > >> Please find attached a slightly updated version of the patchset I sent >> a few months ago. The main change is that I've prepended and additional >> patch which lets the user see the speed at which the image is being >> read and written. This is accomplished by recording the MB/s in a >> single byte in the image header, and using a couple of __nosavedata >> variables to get the data back through the atomic restore. I realise >> the char limits us to 255MB/s at the moment. In future patches, I >> intend to address this by storing the data in a 'proper' image header >> (it's a real problem - TuxOnIce reads and writes on the same set up at >> speeds around 250MB/s). > > I like to help by testing these. Is it sufficient to check out your latest > tuxonice tree, checkout branch for-rafael and switch the hibernate script > to TryMethod disk.conf? Yes, that should be sufficient. You do need to be aware (as I said in the other reply) that I'm treating this branch like a temporary branch, so it's getting rebased and having little modifications made to it. Pulling will therefore sometimes require the use of the force option. Regards, Nigel