From: Yuri Kululin <ext-yuri.kululin@nokia.com>
To: ext Guenter Roeck <guenter.roeck@ericsson.com>
Cc: Yuri Ershov <ext-yuri.ershov@nokia.com>,
eric.piel@tremplin-utc.net, samu.p.onkalo@nokia.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, daniel@caiaq.de,
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [1/2] lis3: Add device owner
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 12:52:19 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CA1ACC3.4000809@nokia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100924202404.GA20813@ericsson.com>
ext Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 02:33:20PM -0000, Yuri Ershov wrote:
>> Add device owner and change /dev/freefall file operations owner
>> according to the used driver
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yuri Kululin <ext-yuri.kululin@nokia.com>
>>
>> ---
>> drivers/hwmon/lis3lv02d.c | 8 ++++++--
>> drivers/hwmon/lis3lv02d.h | 2 ++
>> 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/lis3lv02d.c b/drivers/hwmon/lis3lv02d.c
>> index e278f0e..0f1bd36 100644
>> --- a/drivers/hwmon/lis3lv02d.c
>> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/lis3lv02d.c
>> @@ -591,8 +591,7 @@ static int lis3lv02d_misc_fasync(int fd, struct file *file, int on)
>> return fasync_helper(fd, file, on, &lis3_dev.async_queue);
>> }
>>
>> -static const struct file_operations lis3lv02d_misc_fops = {
>> - .owner = THIS_MODULE,
>> +static struct file_operations lis3lv02d_misc_fops = {
>> .llseek = no_llseek,
>> .read = lis3lv02d_misc_read,
>> .open = lis3lv02d_misc_open,
>> @@ -1007,6 +1006,11 @@ int lis3lv02d_init_device(struct lis3lv02d *dev)
>> goto out;
>> }
>>
>> + if (dev->owner)
>> + lis3lv02d_misc_fops.owner = dev->owner;
>> + else
>> + lis3lv02d_misc_fops.owner = THIS_MODULE;
>> +
> If you retained the static assignment to .owner above, you would not need
> the else part here.
Yes, you are right. I can change this.
> Also, this depends on patch#2, which actually sets dev->owner.
> So the problem isn't really addressed w/o patch #2. Given that,
> I am not sure if it makes sense to have two separate patches.
Ok, I can merge my patches.
> If both patches were applied as one, you might not need the if ()
> above in the first place. And if you do, you might still not have solved
> the problem completely since .owner would not be set correctly
> if dev->owner is NULL.
I've added "if" here to keep the situation "as is" for all other drivers
(HP driver - hp_accel.c and spi part - lis3lv02d_spi.c. I don't have the HW to
test) which are using the lis3 core. If we want to avoid the issues with
unloading completely all parts should set the dev->owner. Not a problem to add
this to HP driver and lis3lv02d_spi.c.
> On a higher level, reassigning the owner like this seems to be quite uncommon,
> at least in hwmon. I would like to see an Acked-by from Eric to ensure
> that the fix is correct.
I tried to use the standard way of module usage control because all functions
provided by lis3lv02d_i2c.c, lis3lv02d_spi.c or hp_accel.c can be called through
lis3lv02d_misc_fops file ops or joystick poll device.
I can propose another solution. We can use try_module_get(owner) during device
registration (in lis3lv02d_add_fs()), release module by using module_put(owner)
after device unregister (in lis3lv02d_remove_fs()) and do not touch
lis3lv02d_misc_fops. But anyway dev->owner should be set.
Thanks a lot for reviewing,
Yuri K
>
> Thanks,
> Guenter
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-28 8:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-08-27 14:33 [PATCH 0/2] Accelerometer driver unload Yuri Ershov
2010-08-27 14:33 ` [PATCH 1/2] lis3: Add device owner Yuri Ershov
2010-08-27 14:33 ` [PATCH 2/2] lis3: Set " Yuri Ershov
2010-09-24 20:27 ` [2/2] " Guenter Roeck
2010-09-24 20:24 ` [1/2] lis3: Add " Guenter Roeck
2010-09-28 8:52 ` Yuri Kululin [this message]
2010-10-02 0:03 ` Guenter Roeck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4CA1ACC3.4000809@nokia.com \
--to=ext-yuri.kululin@nokia.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=daniel@caiaq.de \
--cc=eric.piel@tremplin-utc.net \
--cc=ext-yuri.ershov@nokia.com \
--cc=guenter.roeck@ericsson.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org \
--cc=samu.p.onkalo@nokia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome