From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760532Ab0JGOw5 (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Oct 2010 10:52:57 -0400 Received: from vpn.id2.novell.com ([195.33.99.129]:49834 "EHLO vpn.id2.novell.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754267Ab0JGOwz convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Oct 2010 10:52:55 -0400 Message-Id: <4CADFAE6020000780001B4DC@vpn.id2.novell.com> X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise Internet Agent 8.0.1 Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2010 15:52:54 +0100 From: "Jan Beulich" To: "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: Subject: Re: patch disabling use of PSE on Atom CPUs with a certain erratum References: <4CADAB3A020000780001B30A@vpn.id2.novell.com> <4CADCF23.5070800@zytor.com> <4CADEED9020000780001B44F@vpn.id2.novell.com> <4CADD442.4050706@zytor.com> In-Reply-To: <4CADD442.4050706@zytor.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >>> On 07.10.10 at 16:08, "H. Peter Anvin" wrote: > On 10/07/2010 07:01 AM, Jan Beulich wrote: >>> >>> Those Atoms don't have 64-bit support. >> >> That's different from what I found looking around on the web. >> > > Do tell... E.g. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Intel_Atom_microprocessors in particular the Atom 230 and Atom 330 (which to my reading match the spec updates for the 200 and 300 series, which in turn exhibit the erratum in question). Jan