From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756817Ab0JOUHU (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Oct 2010 16:07:20 -0400 Received: from hera.kernel.org ([140.211.167.34]:56682 "EHLO hera.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756629Ab0JOUHT (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Oct 2010 16:07:19 -0400 Message-ID: <4CB8B462.2080108@kernel.org> Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2010 22:06:58 +0200 From: Tejun Heo User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100915 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Christian Lamparter CC: "John W. Linville" , Johannes Berg , Linux Wireless List , lkml Subject: Re: [PATCH v2.6.36-rc7] mac80211: cancel restart_work explicitly instead of depending on flush_scheduled_work() References: <4CB874C0.8090003@kernel.org> <20101015192645.GA2438@tuxdriver.com> <4CB8AC80.7090802@kernel.org> <201010152207.31553.chunkeey@googlemail.com> In-Reply-To: <201010152207.31553.chunkeey@googlemail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.3 (hera.kernel.org [127.0.0.1]); Fri, 15 Oct 2010 20:07:10 +0000 (UTC) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello, On 10/15/2010 10:07 PM, Christian Lamparter wrote: > Oh, so the "[PATCH v2.6.36-rc7]" in the patch subject was just "misleading" me. Ah, sorry about that. I usually tag them with the version tag the patch was generated against, not the target version. Now that I think about it, it could definitely be confusing. I'll try to be clearer. Thanks. -- tejun