mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com, Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
	Trinabh Gupta <trinabh@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Venkatesh Pallipadi <venki@google.com>,
	lenb@kernel.org, suresh.b.siddha@intel.com,
	benh@kernel.crashing.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC V1] cpuidle: add idle routine registration and cleanup pm_idle pointer
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2010 12:29:32 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CBF431C.3070002@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1287602923.3673.1.camel@laptop>

  On 10/20/2010 12:28 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-10-20 at 12:25 -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
>> (the pm_idle is an x86 only problem. other architectures should be able
>> to keep doing what they are doing)
> sadly no, some architectures copied this brilliant piece of design.
>
> A quick git grep suggests:
> arm/blackfin/cris/ia64/m32r/m68knommu/microblaze/mn10300/sh/sparc all
> have pm_idle.

any of those that only every use one are the easy case.

the ones that use multiple can convert to the same solution x86 has over 
time.



  reply	other threads:[~2010-10-20 19:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-10-19 18:36 Trinabh Gupta
2010-10-19 18:38 ` Arjan van de Ven
2010-10-19 18:49   ` Venkatesh Pallipadi
2010-10-19 19:01     ` Trinabh Gupta
2010-10-20 15:12       ` Trinabh Gupta
2010-10-20 15:18         ` Arjan van de Ven
2010-10-20 15:34           ` Andi Kleen
2010-10-20 16:03             ` Arjan van de Ven
2010-10-20 19:19               ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2010-10-20 19:25                 ` Arjan van de Ven
2010-10-20 19:28                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-10-20 19:29                     ` Arjan van de Ven [this message]
2010-10-20 19:40                   ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2010-10-20 19:44                     ` Arjan van de Ven
2010-10-20 19:47                       ` Venkatesh Pallipadi
2010-10-20 20:03                         ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2010-10-20 20:47                         ` Arjan van de Ven
2010-10-20 21:19                           ` Venkatesh Pallipadi
2010-10-20 20:55               ` Dipankar Sarma
2010-10-20 15:57           ` Trinabh Gupta

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4CBF431C.3070002@linux.intel.com \
    --to=arjan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
    --cc=svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=trinabh@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=venki@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome