From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: James Cloos <cloos@jhcloos.com>,
Eli Billauer <eli@billauer.co.il>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: open() on /dev/tty takes 30 seconds on 2.6.36
Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2010 11:28:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CCFE7C1.60909@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201010311236.38844.arnd@arndb.de>
Hello,
On 10/31/2010 12:36 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Sunday 31 October 2010, James Cloos wrote:
>> WARNING: at kernel/workqueue.c:1180 worker_enter_idle+0xd6/0xe2()
>> Hardware name: MS-7642
>> Modules linked in: tcp_diag inet_diag ipt_addrtype xt_dscp xt_string xt_owner xt_multiport xt_iprange xt_hashlimit xt_DSCP xt_NFQUEUE xt_mark xt_connmark tun snd_pcm_oss snd_mixer_oss snd_usb_audio snd_usbmidi_lib snd_rawmidi tpm_tis tpm ppdev parport_pc tpm_bios parport serio_raw edac_core k10temp pcspkr i2c_piix4 shpchp
>> Pid: 8061, comm: kworker/0:1 Not tainted 2.6.36-carbon1 #18
>> Call Trace:
>> [<ffffffff81050c60>] warn_slowpath_common+0x85/0x9d
>> [<ffffffff81050c92>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x1c
>> [<ffffffff81066861>] worker_enter_idle+0xd6/0xe2
>> [<ffffffff81068453>] worker_thread+0x182/0x19b
>> [<ffffffff810682d1>] ? worker_thread+0x0/0x19b
>> [<ffffffff8106ba81>] kthread+0x82/0x8a
>> [<ffffffff8100aae4>] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10
>> [<ffffffff8106b9ff>] ? kthread+0x0/0x8a
>> [<ffffffff8100aae0>] ? kernel_thread_helper+0x0/0x10
>> ---[ end trace 756b0818a6415dca ]---
>>
>> That was followed by a number of task blocked for more than 120 seconds
>> messages, all due to waiting for pty input or output. An example trace:
>
> This is triggered by an internal check in the workqueue handling that
> Tejun introduced. I guess it might be possible that this is triggered by
> a worker thread being blocked on a mutex, but I don't understand
> exactly what it is checking for.
Hmmm... that's a condition which shouldn't happen regardless of being
blocked on mutex or whatever. It means that internal book keeping
used to manage concurrency went out of sync somehow. I've re-read the
code managing nr_running but couldn't spot where the problem could be.
Is there any way to reproduce the problem?
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-02 10:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-30 7:47 Eli Billauer
2010-10-30 18:46 ` Andrew Morton
2010-10-30 20:46 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-10-31 0:20 ` Eli Billauer
2010-10-31 3:36 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-10-31 6:34 ` James Cloos
2010-10-31 11:36 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-11-02 10:28 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2010-11-01 1:12 ` Eli Billauer
2010-11-01 19:39 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-11-01 20:46 ` Alan Cox
2010-11-03 0:15 ` Eli Billauer
2010-11-03 3:32 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-11-03 10:34 ` Alan Cox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4CCFE7C1.60909@kernel.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=cloos@jhcloos.com \
--cc=eli@billauer.co.il \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome