From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
tglx@linutronix.de, x86@kernel.org, eric.dumazet@gmail.com,
yinghai@kernel.org, brgerst@gmail.com, gorcunov@gmail.com,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
shaohui.zheng@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/16] x86: Unify cpu/apicid <-> NUMA node mapping between 32 and 64bit
Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2010 11:36:40 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D1B8DC8.6000104@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101229105253.GK488@htj.dyndns.org>
On 12/29/2010 02:52 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 12:35:45PM -0800, David Rientjes wrote:
>> This is going to conflict with a387e95a ("") in x86/numa, so you'll need
>> the following hunk for acpi_fake_nodes(). I'm not sure why this patchset
>> is being based on x86/apic-cleanup rather than x86/numa?
>
> Because several patches from the patchset have already been committed
> into x86/apic-cleanup. Thomas, Peter, if this needs to be rebased
> somewhere, let me know.
>
x86/numa is already a dependent branch (on x86/amd-nb), so I'm fine
merging x86/apic-cleanup into that branch and then if you could rebase
it on top of the new x86/numa then I'll push it out tomorrow.
OK?
-hpa
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-12-29 19:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-12-28 11:48 [PATCHSET REPOST] x86: unify x86_32 and 64 NUMA init paths, take#3 Tejun Heo
2010-12-28 11:48 ` [PATCH 01/16] x86: Kill unused static boot_cpu_logical_apicid in smpboot.c Tejun Heo
2010-12-28 11:48 ` [PATCH 02/16] x86: Rename x86_32 MAX_APICID to MAX_LOCAL_APIC Tejun Heo
2010-12-28 11:48 ` [PATCH 03/16] x86: Make default_send_IPI_mask_sequence/allbutself_logical() 32bit only Tejun Heo
2010-12-28 11:48 ` [PATCH 04/16] x86: Replace cpu_2_logical_apicid[] with early percpu variable Tejun Heo
2010-12-28 11:48 ` [PATCH 05/16] x86: Always use x86_cpu_to_logical_apicid for cpu -> logical apic id Tejun Heo
2010-12-28 11:48 ` [PATCH 06/16] x86: Kill apic->cpu_to_logical_apicid() Tejun Heo
2010-12-28 11:48 ` [PATCH 07/16] x86: Add apic->x86_32_early_logical_apicid() Tejun Heo
2010-12-28 11:48 ` [PATCH 08/16] x86: Implement the default x86_32_early_logical_apicid() Tejun Heo
2010-12-28 11:48 ` [PATCH 09/16] x86: Implement x86_32_early_logical_apicid() for bigsmp_32 Tejun Heo
2010-12-28 11:48 ` [PATCH 10/16] x86: Implement x86_32_early_logical_apicid() for summit_32 Tejun Heo
2010-12-28 11:48 ` [PATCH 11/16] x86: Implement x86_32_early_logical_apicid() for numaq_32 Tejun Heo
2010-12-28 11:48 ` [PATCH 12/16] x86: Replace apic->apicid_to_node() with ->x86_32_numa_cpu_node() Tejun Heo
2010-12-28 11:48 ` [PATCH 13/16] x86: Unify cpu/apicid <-> NUMA node mapping between 32 and 64bit Tejun Heo
2010-12-28 20:35 ` David Rientjes
2010-12-29 10:52 ` Tejun Heo
2010-12-29 19:36 ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2010-12-29 22:05 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-12-30 11:33 ` Tejun Heo
2010-12-28 11:48 ` [PATCH 14/16] x86: Unify CPU -> " Tejun Heo
2010-12-28 20:39 ` David Rientjes
2010-12-28 11:48 ` [PATCH 15/16] x86: Unify node_to_cpumask_map handling " Tejun Heo
2010-12-28 20:43 ` David Rientjes
2010-12-30 12:48 ` Tejun Heo
2010-12-30 14:58 ` Tejun Heo
2010-12-30 18:40 ` David Rientjes
2010-12-31 13:20 ` Tejun Heo
2010-12-31 23:09 ` David Rientjes
2010-12-30 18:43 ` David Rientjes
2010-12-28 11:48 ` [PATCH 16/16] x86: Unify NUMA initialization " Tejun Heo
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-01-23 13:37 [PATCHSET] x86: unify x86_32 and 64 NUMA init paths, take#5 Tejun Heo
2011-01-23 13:37 ` [PATCH 13/16] x86: Unify cpu/apicid <-> NUMA node mapping between 32 and 64bit Tejun Heo
2010-12-30 17:49 [PATCHSET] x86: unify x86_32 and 64 NUMA init paths, take#4 Tejun Heo
2010-12-30 17:49 ` [PATCH 13/16] x86: Unify cpu/apicid <-> NUMA node mapping between 32 and 64bit Tejun Heo
2010-11-27 15:21 [PATCHSET] x86: unify x86_32 and 64 NUMA init paths, take#2 Tejun Heo
2010-11-27 15:22 ` [PATCH 13/16] x86: Unify cpu/apicid <-> NUMA node mapping between 32 and 64bit Tejun Heo
2010-12-09 21:43 ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-12-10 20:45 ` Tejun Heo
2010-12-10 20:54 ` Tejun Heo
2010-12-10 21:17 ` Yinghai Lu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D1B8DC8.6000104@zytor.com \
--to=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=brgerst@gmail.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=gorcunov@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=shaohui.zheng@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome