mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
	Dominique Toupin <dominique.toupin@ericsson.com>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
	"2nddept-manager@sdl.hitachi.co.jp" 
	<2nddept-manager@sdl.hitachi.co.jp>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/4] ftrace: Use -mfentry when supported (this is for x86_64 right now)
Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2011 14:07:24 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D5F500C.40509@hitachi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1298070174.23343.987.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>

(2011/02/19 8:02), Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-02-18 at 14:45 -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> 
>> We should also be able to use the breakpoint hack to avoid holding all
>> the CPUs.  They still need to be interrupted, but that skips the
>> rendezvous operation.

That's what I've done with text_poke_fixup()
http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/12/18/312

And I think it still not be checked officially from silicon side.

> As this is about the ftrace code, I'm in the process of analyzing and
> updating how the function tracer works. I can look to see if I can
> design it so we don't have to always use stop_machine() if a breakpoint
> method is in place.
> 
> Basically what is needed is to convert a "nop" into a "call" or maybe
> the other way around, safely.
> 
> Now is it safe to insert a breakpoint (usually a byte I believe), modify
> the rest of the instruction and then replace the breakpoint to the new
> code? Since the instruction that is being replaced or the instruction
> being added is always a nop, the breakpoint handler needs to do nothing
> but return to the location after the nop/call.

Yes, at least with text_poke_fixup(), you can call it as below

text_poke_fixup(addr, call_insn, CALL_INSN_SIZE, addr + CALL_INSN_SIZE);

Then, if a processor hits the addr, the breakpoint handler changes its
regs->ip to addr + CALL_INSN_SIZE so that it skips the modifying
instruction.

> Is there any synchronization that needs to be done when doing this? Or
> can it just be:
> 
> 	insert_breakpoint();
> 	update_instruction();
> 	remove_breakpoint();
> 
> Because we need to do this for 22,000 calls in a row.

In the case of text_poke_fixup(), it sends IPI twice for synchronization,
which doesn't stop all cores but current core. Of course, theoretically
this can be reduced by doing it in a batch.

Thank you,

-- 
Masami HIRAMATSU
2nd Dept. Linux Technology Center
Hitachi, Ltd., Systems Development Laboratory
E-mail: masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com

  reply	other threads:[~2011-02-19  5:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-02-09 20:02 Steven Rostedt
2011-02-09 20:02 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/4] ftrace: Make recordmcount.c handle __fentry__ Steven Rostedt
2011-02-09 20:02 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/4] ftrace: Add -mfentry to Makefile on function tracer Steven Rostedt
2011-02-09 20:28   ` Steven Rostedt
2011-02-09 21:22     ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-02-09 20:02 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/4] ftrace: Do not test frame pointers if -mfentry is used Steven Rostedt
2011-02-09 20:02 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/4] ftrace/x86: Add support for -mfentry to x86_64 Steven Rostedt
2011-02-10  2:38 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/4] ftrace: Use -mfentry when supported (this is for x86_64 right now) Masami Hiramatsu
2011-02-17 12:37 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2011-02-17 13:18   ` Steven Rostedt
2011-02-17 15:34     ` Masami Hiramatsu
2011-02-17 15:46       ` Steven Rostedt
2011-02-17 16:07         ` Masami Hiramatsu
2011-02-17 20:11           ` Steven Rostedt
2011-02-18 11:45             ` Masami Hiramatsu
2011-02-18 15:07               ` Steven Rostedt
2011-02-18 15:19                 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-02-18 20:10                   ` Dominique Toupin
2011-02-18 20:36                     ` Steven Rostedt
2011-02-18 21:45                       ` Dominique Toupin
2011-02-18 22:39                     ` Andi Kleen
2011-02-18 22:45                       ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-02-18 23:02                         ` Steven Rostedt
2011-02-19  5:07                           ` Masami Hiramatsu [this message]
2011-02-19  5:10                           ` hpas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4D5F500C.40509@hitachi.com \
    --to=masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com \
    --cc=2nddept-manager@sdl.hitachi.co.jp \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=dominique.toupin@ericsson.com \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome