mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
To: Johannes Weiner <jweiner@redhat.com>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
	"Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>,
	Jan Beulich <JBeulich@novell.com>,
	Larry Woodman <lwoodman@redhat.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix pgd_lock deadlock
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2011 09:40:25 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D62A389.60004@goop.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110217101941.GH2380@redhat.com>

On 02/17/2011 02:19 AM, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> So Xen needs all page tables protected when pinning/unpinning and
> extended page_table_lock to cover kernel range, which it does nowhere
> else AFAICS.  But the places it extended are also taking the pgd_lock,
> so I wonder if Xen could just take the pgd_lock itself in these paths
> and we could revert page_table_lock back to cover user va only?
> Jeremy, could this work?  Untested.

Yes, this looks pretty plausible, but I need to go back and check what
the original bug was to make sure.  Oh, and test it I guess.

But xen_pgd_pin/unpin only operate on the usermode parts of the address
space (since the kernel part is shared and always pinned), so there
shouldn't be any contention there.

Hm, and I don't see why pin/unpin really care about pgd_lock either. 
They're called at well-defined places (fork/exec/exit) on a single pgd. 
pin/unpin_all are a different matter - since they walk the pgd list -
but they were taking the lock anyway.

Will need to think about this a bit.

    J

> 	Hannes
>
> ---
>  arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable.h |    2 --
>  arch/x86/mm/fault.c            |   14 ++------------
>  arch/x86/mm/init_64.c          |    6 ------
>  arch/x86/mm/pgtable.c          |   20 +++-----------------
>  arch/x86/xen/mmu.c             |    8 ++++++++
>  5 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable.h
> index 18601c8..8c0335a 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable.h
> @@ -28,8 +28,6 @@ extern unsigned long empty_zero_page[PAGE_SIZE / sizeof(unsigned long)];
>  extern spinlock_t pgd_lock;
>  extern struct list_head pgd_list;
>  
> -extern struct mm_struct *pgd_page_get_mm(struct page *page);
> -
>  #ifdef CONFIG_PARAVIRT
>  #include <asm/paravirt.h>
>  #else  /* !CONFIG_PARAVIRT */
> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/fault.c b/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
> index 7d90ceb..5da4155 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
> @@ -234,19 +234,9 @@ void vmalloc_sync_all(void)
>  		struct page *page;
>  
>  		spin_lock_irqsave(&pgd_lock, flags);
> -		list_for_each_entry(page, &pgd_list, lru) {
> -			spinlock_t *pgt_lock;
> -			pmd_t *ret;
> -
> -			pgt_lock = &pgd_page_get_mm(page)->page_table_lock;
> -
> -			spin_lock(pgt_lock);
> -			ret = vmalloc_sync_one(page_address(page), address);
> -			spin_unlock(pgt_lock);
> -
> -			if (!ret)
> +		list_for_each_entry(page, &pgd_list, lru)
> +			if (!vmalloc_sync_one(page_address(page), address))
>  				break;
> -		}
>  		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pgd_lock, flags);
>  	}
>  }
> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c b/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c
> index 71a5929..9332f21 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c
> @@ -114,19 +114,13 @@ void sync_global_pgds(unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
>  		spin_lock_irqsave(&pgd_lock, flags);
>  		list_for_each_entry(page, &pgd_list, lru) {
>  			pgd_t *pgd;
> -			spinlock_t *pgt_lock;
>  
>  			pgd = (pgd_t *)page_address(page) + pgd_index(address);
> -			pgt_lock = &pgd_page_get_mm(page)->page_table_lock;
> -			spin_lock(pgt_lock);
> -
>  			if (pgd_none(*pgd))
>  				set_pgd(pgd, *pgd_ref);
>  			else
>  				BUG_ON(pgd_page_vaddr(*pgd)
>  				       != pgd_page_vaddr(*pgd_ref));
> -
> -			spin_unlock(pgt_lock);
>  		}
>  		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pgd_lock, flags);
>  	}
> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/pgtable.c b/arch/x86/mm/pgtable.c
> index 500242d..72107ab 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/mm/pgtable.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/pgtable.c
> @@ -87,19 +87,7 @@ static inline void pgd_list_del(pgd_t *pgd)
>  #define UNSHARED_PTRS_PER_PGD				\
>  	(SHARED_KERNEL_PMD ? KERNEL_PGD_BOUNDARY : PTRS_PER_PGD)
>  
> -
> -static void pgd_set_mm(pgd_t *pgd, struct mm_struct *mm)
> -{
> -	BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(virt_to_page(pgd)->index) < sizeof(mm));
> -	virt_to_page(pgd)->index = (pgoff_t)mm;
> -}
> -
> -struct mm_struct *pgd_page_get_mm(struct page *page)
> -{
> -	return (struct mm_struct *)page->index;
> -}
> -
> -static void pgd_ctor(struct mm_struct *mm, pgd_t *pgd)
> +static void pgd_ctor(pgd_t *pgd)
>  {
>  	/* If the pgd points to a shared pagetable level (either the
>  	   ptes in non-PAE, or shared PMD in PAE), then just copy the
> @@ -113,10 +101,8 @@ static void pgd_ctor(struct mm_struct *mm, pgd_t *pgd)
>  	}
>  
>  	/* list required to sync kernel mapping updates */
> -	if (!SHARED_KERNEL_PMD) {
> -		pgd_set_mm(pgd, mm);
> +	if (!SHARED_KERNEL_PMD)
>  		pgd_list_add(pgd);
> -	}
>  }
>  
>  static void pgd_dtor(pgd_t *pgd)
> @@ -282,7 +268,7 @@ pgd_t *pgd_alloc(struct mm_struct *mm)
>  	 */
>  	spin_lock_irqsave(&pgd_lock, flags);
>  
> -	pgd_ctor(mm, pgd);
> +	pgd_ctor(pgd);
>  	pgd_prepopulate_pmd(mm, pgd, pmds);
>  
>  	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pgd_lock, flags);
> diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/mmu.c b/arch/x86/xen/mmu.c
> index 5e22810..97fbfce 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/xen/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/xen/mmu.c
> @@ -1021,7 +1021,11 @@ static void __xen_pgd_pin(struct mm_struct *mm, pgd_t *pgd)
>  
>  static void xen_pgd_pin(struct mm_struct *mm)
>  {
> +	unsigned long flags;
> +
> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&pgd_lock, flags);
>  	__xen_pgd_pin(mm, mm->pgd);
> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pgd_lock, flags);
>  }
>  
>  /*
> @@ -1140,7 +1144,11 @@ static void __xen_pgd_unpin(struct mm_struct *mm, pgd_t *pgd)
>  
>  static void xen_pgd_unpin(struct mm_struct *mm)
>  {
> +	unsigned long flags;
> +
> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&pgd_lock, flags);
>  	__xen_pgd_unpin(mm, mm->pgd);
> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pgd_lock, flags);
>  }
>  
>  /*
>


  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-02-21 17:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-10-14 20:56 [PATCH] x86: hold mm->page_table_lock while doing vmalloc_sync Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2010-10-15 17:07 ` [Xen-devel] " Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2010-10-19 22:17   ` [tip:x86/mm] x86, mm: Hold " tip-bot for Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2010-10-20 10:36     ` Borislav Petkov
2010-10-20 19:31       ` [tip:x86/mm] x86, mm: Fix incorrect data type in vmalloc_sync_all() tip-bot for tip-bot for Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2010-10-20 19:50         ` Borislav Petkov
2010-10-20 19:53           ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-10-20 20:10             ` Borislav Petkov
2010-10-20 20:13               ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-10-20 22:11                 ` Borislav Petkov
2010-10-20 21:26             ` Ben Pfaff
2010-10-20 19:58       ` tip-bot for Borislav Petkov
2010-10-21 21:06 ` [PATCH] x86: hold mm->page_table_lock while doing vmalloc_sync Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2010-10-21 21:26   ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-10-21 21:34     ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2011-02-03  2:48   ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-02-03 20:44     ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2011-02-04  1:21       ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-02-04 21:27         ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2011-02-07 23:20           ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-02-15 19:07             ` [PATCH] fix pgd_lock deadlock Andrea Arcangeli
2011-02-15 19:26               ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-02-15 19:54                 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-02-15 20:05                   ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-02-15 20:26                     ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-02-15 22:52                       ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-02-15 23:03                         ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-02-15 23:17                           ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-02-16  9:58                             ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-02-16 10:15                               ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-02-16 10:28                                 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-02-16 14:49                                   ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-02-16 16:26                                     ` Rik van Riel
2011-02-16 20:15                                     ` Ingo Molnar
2012-04-23  9:07                                     ` [2.6.32.y][PATCH] " Philipp Hahn
2012-04-23 19:09                                       ` Willy Tarreau
2011-02-16 18:33                     ` [PATCH] " Andrea Arcangeli
2011-02-16 21:34                       ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-02-17 10:19                       ` Johannes Weiner
2011-02-21 14:30                         ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-02-21 14:53                           ` Johannes Weiner
2011-02-22  7:48                             ` Jan Beulich
2011-02-22 13:49                               ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-02-22 14:22                                 ` Jan Beulich
2011-02-22 14:34                                   ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-02-22 17:08                                     ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2011-02-22 17:13                                       ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-02-24  4:22                                   ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-02-24  8:23                                     ` Jan Beulich
2011-02-24 14:11                                       ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-02-21 17:40                         ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge [this message]
2011-02-03 20:59     ` [PATCH] x86: hold mm->page_table_lock while doing vmalloc_sync Larry Woodman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4D62A389.60004@goop.org \
    --to=jeremy@goop.org \
    --cc=Ian.Campbell@citrix.com \
    --cc=JBeulich@novell.com \
    --cc=Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
    --cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=jweiner@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lwoodman@redhat.com \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome