From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@kernel.org>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@mit.edu>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86-64: Clean up vdso/kernel shared variables
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 08:03:36 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D934648.7040500@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c79ac2a9a1caad9865ffa3c4a05438227c59f63e.1301408701.git.luto@mit.edu>
On 03/29/2011 07:29 AM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> Variables that are shared between the vdso and the kernel are
> currently a bit of a mess. They are each defined with their own
> magic, they are accessed differently in the kernel, the vsyscall page,
> and the vdso, and one of them (vsyscall_clock) doesn't even really
> exist.
>
> This changes them all to use a common mechanism. All of them are
> delcared in vvar.h with a fixed address (validated by the linker
> script). In the kernel (as before), they look like ordinary
> read-write variables. In the vsyscall page and the vdso, they are
> accessed through a new macro VVAR, which gives read-only access.
>
> The vdso is now loaded verbatim into memory without any fixups. As a
> side bonus, access from the vdso is faster because a level of
> indirection is removed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@mit.edu>
How does this deal with variables which really should be shared with
multiple vdsos (in particular the 32-bit vdso and the 64-bit vdso)?
Part of me is wondering if it might not be simpler to put them all into
a structure?
-hpa
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-30 15:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-29 14:29 Andy Lutomirski
2011-03-30 15:03 ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2011-03-30 15:33 ` Andrew Lutomirski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D934648.7040500@kernel.org \
--to=hpa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@mit.edu \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®