From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758300Ab1DASls (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Apr 2011 14:41:48 -0400 Received: from sj-iport-2.cisco.com ([171.71.176.71]:19735 "EHLO sj-iport-2.cisco.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755003Ab1DASlr (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Apr 2011 14:41:47 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.63,283,1299456000"; d="scan'208";a="329149870" Message-ID: <4D961C6A.9070808@cisco.com> Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2011 11:41:46 -0700 From: Michael Sundius User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090825) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Daney CC: Kevin Cernekee , Ralf Baechle , David VomLehn , Dave Hansen , Andy Whitcroft , Jon Fraser , linux-mips@linux-mips.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] MIPS: Kernel crashes on boot with SPARSEMEM + HIGHMEM enabled References: <4D9603D8.2010709@caviumnetworks.com> In-Reply-To: <4D9603D8.2010709@caviumnetworks.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org David Daney wrote: > > > I think this may do the same thing as my patch: > > http://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/1988/ > > Although my patch had different motivations, and changes some other > things around too. > > David Daney > I'm not really sure why your kernel or initrd would be in memory was not within the range that had been accounted for. are you saying its in high mem?